« Reply #13 on: Sunday 06 May 18 01:57 BST (UK) »
I think it says more about the Companies used than the testing.
Only 2 ' established' companies* in Ancestry and MyHeritage were used with the other 3 , companies I admit to not knowing of and seemingly small US state based services. There is a reason I use a US based company rather than one in the state I live in Australia
The journalist makes the same mistakes DNA companies use in grouping everyone in the same boat. There is no differentiation by the journalist between ethnicity tests and genealogical tests. And yes there are huge differences in my opinion.
It is my opinion ethnicity results are a dart board.
*established companies means those companies offering Genealogical Results
Genealogy-Its a family thing
Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann, Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole
Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead
Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley
Brickwalls- Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072