Hello again experts,
In researching my ancestry, one record in 1891 has been of particular interest to me:
Thomas Coulson etc etc
Page Number: 55
Registration Number: RG12
Piece/Folio: 4170/ 82
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:WJMM-MN2The house is interesting because so many relatives are squeezed into it.
The house is 'headed' by Mr Forster, who is a painter.
We see his wife and a few children.
We also see the wife's father, Thomas Coulson as well as two of her brothers.
One of these brothers, William, is fresh back from London with his wife and their first baby.
There's also an aunt named Mary Ann Sanderson who appears to be visiting.
The spelling of these names by the way is absolutely attrocious.
Be warned. Sanderson for example is Suderson. Coulson is Corlson.
--> My interest is not the people but the house.
Please do not go wildly off into other censuses looking for these people because I have already researched these relatives quite intensely.
What I would like to know now is the nature of house and how all these people likely
crammed into it.
I have a picture in mind of a city row house (Coronation Street style), with two bedrooms upstairs and a living space below and a kitchen at the back. Please correct me if this is wrong. Then I superimpose not just one but two families, a single brother and a widowed grandfather, and a visiting aunt. How do you suppose these people distributed themselves throughout the house?
I imagine the two young families would occupy the two bedrooms upstairs (if in fact there were two bedrooms) and the others would spread themselves around the living space in the evenings after everyone had gone off to bed at night. Would there be a fireplace in the kitchen or in the living room, or both? If we can establish the geometry of the house we might get a better picture of how everyone lived in it.
I am trying to write a short history of my ancestors and I have reached this particular household in 1891 and want to paint a realistic picture, not let my imagination run riot.
Any clarification would be most welcome.
-David C