Invitation sent
I have 7 children for David Gibson and Margaret Keith, but only proof (baptism records) for 3 of them, the David Helen and Stuart you have too.
The other children are a "deduction" on my side. Dates are "about":
1) Martha (b1788)
2) David (b1789)
3) Helen (b1791)
4) Stuart (b1795)
5) Charlotte (b1797)
6) Elizabeth (b1800)
7) Mary Ann (b1804)
There is a lot of confusing info, but too many "coincidences" to be just that.
In short:
- Charlotte Gibson married William
Donaldson, Mary Ann Gibson married (1st) Edward
Francis; two of Stuart's daughters were called
Charlotte Donaldson and
Mary Ann Francis- Mary Ann Gibson / Francis' daughter was called Eleanor Eliza, so was another daughter of Stuart
- Mary Ann remarried James Henderson; James' younger brother Thomas was married to Charlotte Gibson / Donaldson's daughter Margaret (named after her maternal grandmother?)
- another one of his brothers, George Henderson, was a witness to Stuart's second marriage
- Stuart witnessed William Donaldson's second marriage (after Charlotte had died around 1828)
- Elizabeth Gibson was a witness to Mary Ann's marriage to Edward Francis
- Elizabeth Gibson was also a witness to Stuart's first marriage (to Mary Tweedie)
- the second witness to Stuart's first marraige, was Samuel Wills; he married a Martha Gibson in 1809, and they had several children, amongst whom a Charlotte and a Margaret
- this Charlotte Wills was a witness to Stuart's second marriage
- Mary Ann's daughter Eleanor Eliza married a Carlyle; William Donaldson's 2nd wife was a Carlyle; Stuart's 1st wife was a Carlyle
- they were all tailors, seemstresses, dress makers etc, living within a mile from each other
So, adding this up I am quite convinced that Martha, Mary Ann, Elizabeth and Charlotte are Stuart's sisters, even if there are no baptisms.
According to the census, Mary Ann was born in St James Westminster in 1804. Charlotte died before the 1st census and I haven't traced Elizabeth yet. I guess David and Margaret took their 3 or 4 children and moved to London, after which they had some more.
Martha's birth year is solely based on her marriage: she would have had to be over 21 in 1809, so 1788 seems plausible, though she would have been a pre-marriage child since David was "conceived" about 2-3 months after the wedding. On the other hand, Mary Ann married her first husband at the age of 15 too so...
Regards,
Tom
PS I would love to read those letters, if I can... I promise I won't put them online!