RootsChat.Com

Beginners => Family History Beginners Board => Topic started by: Horsley2016 on Wednesday 10 October 18 14:29 BST (UK)

Title: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Wednesday 10 October 18 14:29 BST (UK)
Dear all.

Trying to find the birth cert. details of one James Kennedy born either 1876 (according to 2 Census's) or 1877 (if the age listed on his death cert. is correct at 55 when died 22.05.1932.) Born Liverpool and highly likely around the Scotland Road area.

His Father is also a James Kennedy, born circa 1851 but I have no Mother details and there's a fair few options given the name Kennedy! I can find 6 possible matches on GRO for birth between 1876 - 1877 registered either West Derby & Toxteth (districts of Liverpool) or simply under 'Liverpool.'

On his marriage certificate (RC) he has a witness of Thomas Kennedy who I assumed may be his brother. I was led down the line of an Ellen Kennedy then being his Mother (through Census records etc) but then hit a brick wall with that thread as it appeared James would still be living at home, listed as single and working not as a Ships Scaler (as he seems to have done most his life) after his date of marriage!! Lesson learned!

Am I going to have to work through ordering 6 birth certificates? Is there anyway of narrowing this through the Father's name or even where likely a birth in the Scotland Road area would be registered then ? West Derby or 'Liverpool?'

Any thoughts on this would, as always, be most welcome. There are a lot of James Kennedy's in the family and I'm confused at best of times!!! ::)

Thanks Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Wednesday 10 October 18 14:48 BST (UK)
When and where was he married? Have you found the RC marriage record (they often give the mothers' maiden names)?

Which are the census records that you are certain about? Can you give the addresses?

What was his father's occupation?

In the RC baptisms there's Jacobus, filius Jacobi & Mariae Kennedy (mmn Smith) at Our Lady of Reconciliation de La Salette in 1876. A possibility.

Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Wednesday 10 October 18 15:09 BST (UK)

Hi Shaun,

Thanks very much for replying. The Nee Smith is a distinct possibility. I've looked at so many Census records I can't remember which are the ones with Ellen Kennedy as the Mother that lead to a clash but he marries Julia McCarthy in 27.feb.1897 at St Anthonys. His Father is listed as living at 21 Woodstock Street.In 1901 our man is in Virgil Street, 1911 Boundary Street married to Julia and working as the consistently mentioned 'Ships Scaler.' He also appears on his sons marriage cert. as a Ships Scaler too.

The Ellen Kennedy line I made a mistake with seems to have the Father and then son as carriage drivers then proprietors. The whole family seem to have been dockers / ship workers/ seamen so it's out of line for this too (although there is a listed sibling Thomas Kennedy on this line that ties in with the marriage witness.)

Regrettably the cert. info gives little away other than he was living in Woodstock Road and this Thomas Kennedy the witness living in Netherfield Road.

Cant find his Fathers occupation but the apple doesn't seem to fall far from the tree in this side of the family so assuming labourer/docker.

The maiden name possibilties I've come up with are a Connor/Jones/McGinty/Smith/Edwards/Pake ranging from 1876-1877. Be useful to know where Scotland Road residents would have registered the births as that may be able to eliminate 3 records!


Thanks for your thoughts Shaun, much appreciated

M



Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: rosie99 on Wednesday 10 October 18 15:18 BST (UK)
In the RC baptisms there's Jacobus, filius Jacobi & Mariae Kennedy (mmn Smith) at Our Lady of Reconciliation de La Salette in 1876. A possibility.

Possible birth registration for that baptism
KENNEDY, JAMES       mmn SMITH     
1876  Sept Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 66
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: candrjm on Wednesday 10 October 18 15:31 BST (UK)
possible 1881 census name recorded as Kenneday??

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27L-M86Q


Possible marriage:

Marriages Sep 1874 

Kennedy    James         Liverpool    8b   453    
Smith    Mary Ann         Liverpool    8b   453


Childrens birth registrations:

KENNEDY, JAMES        SMITH      
GRO Reference: 1876  S Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 6

KENNEDY, CHARLES        SMITH      
GRO Reference: 1878  D Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 17

KENNEDY, WILLIAM        SMITH      
GRO Reference: 1880  D Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 57
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Wednesday 10 October 18 19:45 BST (UK)
Quote
born either 1876 (according to 2 Census's) or 1877 (if the age listed on his death cert. is correct at 55 when died 22.05.1932

He's 25 in 1901 and 35 in 1911 so probably born between early April 1875 and early April 1876

I have seen newspaper reports from August 1897 of a 22 year old James Kennedy, a scaler, being sentenced to 5 years penal servitude at Liverpool Assizes for wounding one John Nolan. However I'm not seeing this conviction in the criminal records. And your man was at home in the 1901 census so either it wasn't him or the conviction was overturned.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: mckha489 on Wednesday 10 October 18 20:39 BST (UK)


Be useful to know where Scotland Road residents would have registered the births as that may be able to eliminate 3 records!


I don't know if this is helpful or not!  But

in 1881 in Scotland Road is a family named REGAN with a daughter Clara born 1878. Seems an uncommon enough name - so looked in GRO her birth was registered at West Derby and Toxteth Park

but her sister Annie was registered in 1876 and a son Nathan (indexed as Mathew on census)  in 1881 both at Liverpool!!!

I think I would look at the Liverpool registrations first.

There is this - I don't know quite how to interpret it
LIVERPOOL REGISTRATION DISTRICT

Registration County : Lancashire (1837-1934 and 1969-74), Merseyside (from 1974).
Created : 1.7.1837.
Abolished : 1.10.1934 (to become part of Liverpool South registration district).
Re-created : 1.10.1969 (out of Liverpool North and Liverpool South registration districts).
Sub-districts : Abercromby, Broadgreen, Dale Street, Edge Hill, Exchange, Fazakerley, Howard Street, Islington, Liverpool, Mount Pleasant, St. George, St. Martin, St. Thomas, Scotland, Sefton Park, Toxteth Park, Toxteth Park Central, Toxteth Park East, Toxteth Park North, Toxteth Park North West, Toxteth Park South, Toxteth Park South West, Toxteth Park, Wavertree, Woolton
GRO volumes : XX (1837-51), 8b (1852-1934), 10D (1969-74), 36 (1974-92).
Registers currently held at : Liverpool.

https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/reg/districts/liverpool.html

Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Blue70 on Thursday 11 October 18 00:27 BST (UK)
Families moved about a lot in those days. A family could be living off Scotland Road then move into an adjacent district such as Everton or Kirkdale or further away to Bootle. Scotland Road was in Liverpool district, Everton, Kirkdale and Bootle came under West Derby. Have a look at this 1900 map. North Scotland, South Scotland, Vauxhall and St. Anne's were in Liverpool district, Sandhills, Kirkdale, St. Domingo, Netherfield and Everton were in West derby district:-

http://www.liverpoolpictorial.co.uk/liverpool_1900/


Blue 
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 08:36 BST (UK)
Dear all,

Thank you so much for the help. That 1900 map is amazing! Shaun J, I had seen a link of that newspaper report via ancestry and it's sitting there while I decide if it was him or not! As you say, in 1901 he was home so either not him, or the conviction was overturned. Did they get let out for good behaviour back then? Also, would it not have been impossible for him to get work after that?

I also hadn't appreciated the birth could be in 1875 - as you say, given the Census info he is most likely to have been born early 1875 - early 1876. I had simply taken 55 off his date of death as per the death certificate and landed at 1877 for his birth! I haven't even searched on 1875 births which I'm about to do!!! **** Update having done so via GRO I can't see any JK births in Liverpool or West Derby for all of 1875****

***Further info*** Given there was nothing registered 1875, 1876 narrows it to:
MQ West Derby 8B 416 CONNOR
JQ West Derby 8B 338 JONES
SQ West Derby 8B 443 MCGINTY (which I think, though not sure, is the Ellen Kennedy line that doesn't add up.)

Then I have
SQ Liverpool SQ 8B 66 SMITH
SQ Liverpool 8B 79 EDWARDS

And in 1877 MQ Liverpool 8B 96 PAKE

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 09:22 BST (UK)
I also have searched deaths around that time but I've no idea how I can use the findings to help me?!

In 1876 MQ West Derby 8B 373 James K died at 0

1877 MQ Liverpool 8B 75 James K died at 0

In 1878 SQ Liverpool 8B 70 James K died at 3

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 09:30 BST (UK)
Presumably you don't have the GRO certificate for the 1897 marriage? That might tell you the father's occupation....or it might not. We don't know if the father James was still alive in 1897.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 09:36 BST (UK)
I also have searched deaths around that time but I've no idea how I can use the findings to help me?!

In 1876 MQ West Derby 8B 373 James K died at 0

1877 MQ Liverpool 8B 75 James K died at 0

In 1878 SQ Liverpool 8B 70 James K died at 3

Mx

The 3 yr old who died in 1878 was buried at Ford Cemetery, 30 Aug 1878.  Abode: 2c Gladstone St.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 09:38 BST (UK)
I've attached their marriage cert. which is disappointingly devoid of details!
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 09:49 BST (UK)
Catholic baptisms in Liverpool for Jacobus (James) Kennedy:

13.06.1876 (born 29.05.1876) - parents John & Sarah Ann(a) nee Everds, of 5/1 Gascoyne St
11.09.1876 (born 30.07.1876) - parents James & Mary/Maria nee Smith
26.12.1876 (born 13.12.1876) - parents William and Helen(a)/Ellen nee Pollard
31.12.1876 (born 30.12.1876) - parents Benjamin & Catherine nee Peake
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 09:58 BST (UK)
avm - that's amazing work. I DO know his Father is another James Kennedy and definitely Catholic. So your info points to 11.09.1876 - parents James and Mary/Maria Smith as there are no other Catholic baptisms with the Father being James?

Would you be able to search 1875/1877 at all?

Thank you so much!
Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 10:06 BST (UK)
Quote
I've attached their marriage cert. which is disappointingly devoid of details!
That's the RC marriage register entry. There will also be the normal civil marriage certificate in the prescribed format which the Registrar would have required and which will be held at Liverpool Register Office and at the GRO. See https://goo.gl/a9kwuW
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 10:10 BST (UK)
Nothing for James Kennedy in 1875 (though there may have been Catholic baptisms which are not online).

Others:

James Connor Kennedy born 14.02.1876 & baptised 02.05.1876 to John & Margaret nee Connor.
Patrick James Kennedy born 11.03.1877 & baptised 18.03.1877 to Patrick & Rosanna nee Hannan.
James Kennedy born 10.04.1878 & baptised 16.04.1878 to John & Ellen nee Cahill.
James Kennedy born 26.12.1878 & baptised 27.12.1878 to Joseph & Mary/Maria nee Stanley.

So no competition for James and Mary/Maria nee Smith, though you may be able to eliminate some of the other birth entries.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 10:16 BST (UK)
That's a HUGE help - thank you. I've just found the baptism record of nee Smith and see it's at the Our Lady of Reconciliation de la Salette church, interestingly is where his first born son's marriage takes place (although his own marriage is at St Anthony's)

Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 10:21 BST (UK)
I've just found the baptism record of nee Smith and see it's at the Our Lady of Reconciliation de la Salette church, interestingly is where his first born son's marriage takes place (although his own marriage is at St Anthony's)

It’s a pity he (apparently) didn’t marry in the church where he was baptised - sometimes when they did the priest would helpfully go back and annotate the baptism record with the date of marriage and name of the spouse :)
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 10:28 BST (UK)
Quote
I've just found the baptism record of nee Smith and see it's at the Our Lady of Reconciliation de la Salette

I did mention that in Reply#2
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 10:42 BST (UK)
Spot on Shaun, as always a million thanks. Great to have you all take interest and help. Amazing learning along the way with maps and district registration info! Not to mention I've learned to search the baptism records as a way of reconciling off possibles and finding another route in to a search!

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 11:19 BST (UK)
What children do you have for James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY?
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 11:40 BST (UK)
What children do you have for James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY?

Hi there,

I have William Kennedy born 8 Apr 1897 (2 months after their marriage....) and James Joseph Kennedy born 7 Oct 1912.

Bit of a gap isn't there?    ???

M
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 11:46 BST (UK)
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 11:55 BST (UK)
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.

Possibly buried 13 Dec 1908, aged 6, at Ford Cemetery.

There’s also a James Kennedy burial at Ford in Dec 1903, but the age of 14 months doesn’t match a July birthday.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 12:01 BST (UK)
Census 1901 @  72 Virgil Street
KENNEDY James     25y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Julia        23y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY William     3y                                  b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Daniel     18y     visitor                    b. Liverpool

The 1911 census has James and Julia KENNEDY, married 14 years. No children with them.

The 1911 census has Daniel KENNEDY 30y, wife Catherine 29y, married 9 years, and daughter Bridget 2y.
Also niece Ellen KENNEDY 6y  and nephew Christfer 3y

GRO birth
KENNEDY, Christopher mms.  MCCARTHY     
1907  DQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pg 49

KENNEDY Bridget  mms. McCARTHY
1909 JQ Liverpool   Vol 08b  pg13   

Marriage
KENNEDY Daniel    m.  Catherine McCARTHY
SQ 1902 Vol Liverpool Vol 08b  pg234

I think it is likely that James KENNEDY b. Liverpool 1876/7, and Daniel KENNEDY b. ~1880 Liverpool, are brothers.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: carol8353 on Thursday 11 October 18 12:03 BST (UK)
In 1901 the family appear at 4 (72), Virgil Street, Liverpool.

James Kennedy 25 Ship Scalar b L'pool
Julia Kennedy wife 22 b L'pool
William Kennedy son 3 b L'pool

Also a Daniel Kennedy boarder single 18 b 1883 Ship Scalar b L'pool

(a possible brother?)

RG13/3407
Folio   104
Page   17

Snap Wivenhoe
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 12:03 BST (UK)
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.

Wow, so there is! I can only assume given they had a son in 1912 named James Joseph (and the eldest sons all seem to have been named James in the family) that this little fella died at some point prior to 1912. I can see Ford Cemetery 1903/1908 entries have James Kennedy entries at age 1 and 6 respectively. Sadly no details on them like addresses.

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 12:10 BST (UK)
Where is William KENNEDY b. 1897 Liverpool parents James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY  at 1911
census.

Is this William KENNEDY your ancestor?

"..James Joseph Kennedy born 7 Oct 1912."  Do you know that James is their son, or do you mean that you have found this entry on an index.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 12:11 BST (UK)
Census 1901 @  72 Virgil Street
KENNEDY James     25y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Julia        23y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY William     3y                                  b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Daniel     18y     visitor                    b. Liverpool

The 1911 census has James and Julia KENNEDY, married 14 years. No children with them.

The 1911 census has Daniel KENNEDY 30y, wife Catherine 29y, married 9 years, and daughter Bridget 2y.
Also niece Ellen KENNEDY 6y  and nephew Christfer 3y

GRO birth
KENNEDY, Christopher mms.  MCCARTHY     
1907  DQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pg 49

KENNEDY Bridget  mms. McCARTHY
1909 JQ Liverpool   Vol 08b  pg13   

Marriage
KENNEDY Daniel    m.  Catherine McCARTHY
SQ 1902 Vol Liverpool Vol 08b  pg234

I think it is likely that James KENNEDY b. Liverpool 1876/7, and Daniel KENNEDY b. ~1880 Liverpool, are brothers.


Thank you so much! Love a good Census entry! I'm amazed though there's another Kennedy (Daniel) marrying a McCarthy (Catherine!) I wonder if Catherine and Julia were related?!!! I have just checked my records and have Julia as having a sister Catherine....!

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 12:15 BST (UK)
Where is William KENNEDY b. 1897 Liverpool parents James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY  at 1911
census.

Is this William KENNEDY your ancestor?

"..James Joseph Kennedy born 7 Oct 1912."  Do you know that James is their son, or do you mean that you have found this entry on an index.



The William Kennedy in 1911 appears (by location, address given, age etc) to be "inmate" at St Georges Industrial school which explains the listing as 'alive' on the home Census but not recorded.

The 7 Oct 1912 James Joseph I know for definite is their son as I have his birth certificate.

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 12:39 BST (UK)
Daniel Kennedy son of James Kennedy married Catherine McCarthy daughter of William McCarthy on 26 July 1902 at St Sylvesters. Witnesses Michael Boggins and Alicia Doyle.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: avm228 on Thursday 11 October 18 12:41 BST (UK)
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.

Wow, so there is! I can only assume given they had a son in 1912 named James Joseph (and the eldest sons all seem to have been named James in the family) that this little fella died at some point prior to 1912. I can see Ford Cemetery 1903/1908 entries have James Kennedy entries at age 1 and 6 respectively. Sadly no details on them like addresses.

Mx

Did you see what I said about the burials at reply #24?
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 12:49 BST (UK)
The only GRO birth that fits for Daniel is in Q2 1882 in Liverpool. mmn McGready. 

The only RC baptism that fits is at St Albans, 28 May 1882 (born 18 May) son of James and Helen or Ellen nee McGrady. Sponsors John Lynch and Catherine Dempsey (that  Dempsey name keeps cropping )
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 12:53 BST (UK)
In the 1891 census there's a family that fits at 11 Broom Street, though James is shown as aged 16.

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:79PW-V3Z
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 12:54 BST (UK)
GRO births KENNEDY with mms. McCARTHY  @ Liverpool

KENNEDY, William         
1897  JQ  Vol 08b  pg 28

KENNEDY, James        
1902  SQ   Vol 08b  pg 35   
 
KENNEDY, Christopher      
1907  DQ   Vol 08b  pg 49

KENNEDY, Daniel          
1911  SQ  Vol 08b  pg 75   
 
KENNEDY, Bridget   
1909  JQ  Vol  08b  pg 13   

KENNEDY, Elizabeth       
 1911  SQ  Vol 08b  pg 74

KENNEDY, Margaret
1913  DQ  Vol 08b  pg 65

KENNEDY, Peter
1913  DQ  Vol 08b  pg 64


Also -
KENNEDY, Ellen    mms. HESTON     
1905  JQ   Vol 08b  pg 8

KENNEDY, John     mms   HESTON     
1907  JQ  Vo 08b  pg

KENNEDY, Edward   mms   HESTON 
1909  DQ  Vol 08b pg 26
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 12:59 BST (UK)
James Kennedy married Ellen McGrady at St Alban's on 10 June 1878 - so perhaps not his first wife
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 13:19 BST (UK)
Blimey this is getting interesting and confusing in equal measures!!  :D Thank you all so much for opening up lots of new lines.

I looked at the Daniel Kennedy & Catherine McCarthy St Sylvesters marriage- If we assume from the previous post that Daniel was indeed a brother of James then on this marriage cert. Daniel is son of Jacob (James) and Catherine McCarthy's Father is William , which ties this family accurately together. they married on 26 July 1902 - the same month her sister had James Kennedy baptised there??

The Dempsey name is interesting - Catherine Dempsey is a sponsor of Daniel's birth and we have a Maria Ellen Dempsey witness at Daniel's Mother's marriage... So another tie between this family the McCarthy's? However, I have Daniel being born in 1884 according to the 1891 Census where the family seem to be at 1 Court 6 House Penryhn Street. And that line is MMN Duggan (Father William McCarthy.)

M

Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 13:21 BST (UK)
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.

Possibly buried 13 Dec 1908, aged 6, at Ford Cemetery.

There’s also a James Kennedy burial at Ford in Dec 1903, but the age of 14 months doesn’t match a July birthday.

AVM - thank you. I agree, it wouldn't add up so most likely to have been the 1908 age 6 record.
Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 13:22 BST (UK)
GRO births KENNEDY with mms. McCARTHY  @ Liverpool

KENNEDY, William         
1897  JQ  Vol 08b  pg 28

KENNEDY, James        
1902  SQ   Vol 08b  pg 35   
 
KENNEDY, Christopher      
1907  DQ   Vol 08b  pg 49

KENNEDY, Daniel          
1911  SQ  Vol 08b  pg 75   
 
KENNEDY, Bridget   
1909  JQ  Vol  08b  pg 13   

KENNEDY, Elizabeth       
 1911  SQ  Vol 08b  pg 74

KENNEDY, Margaret
1913  DQ  Vol 08b  pg 65

KENNEDY, Peter
1913  DQ  Vol 08b  pg 64


Also -
KENNEDY, Ellen    mms. HESTON     
1905  JQ   Vol 08b  pg 8

KENNEDY, John     mms   HESTON     
1907  JQ  Vo 08b  pg

KENNEDY, Edward   mms   HESTON 
1909  DQ  Vol 08b pg 26

Thank you so much wivenhoe. I guess my job is to try and work out who were Catherine's (married to James) and who were Julia's children!!  ;D

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 13:34 BST (UK)
Quote
However, I have Daniel being born in 1884 according to the 1891 Census where the family seem to be at 1 Court 6 House Penryhn Street. And that line is MMN Duggan (Father William McCarthy.)

I have them at 11 Broom Street. See reply#35.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 13:45 BST (UK)
Looking at that family at 11 Broom Street in 1891, I am wondering if the enumerator has got James and John the wrong way around. There was a John Kennedy born to James and Mary/Maria Kennedy mmn  Smith,  on 18 October 1874, baptised at Our Lady of Reconciliation de La Salette on 18 November.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 14:27 BST (UK)
Looking at that family at 11 Broom Street in 1891, I am wondering if the enumerator has got James and John the wrong way around. There was a John Kennedy born to James and Mary/Maria Kennedy mmn  Smith,  on 18 October 1874, baptised at Our Lady of Reconciliation de La Salette on 18 November.

I quite agree with you. Can only see the list on your link - thought I would easily find it on ancestry... nothing's easy on ancestry!!  ;) Will keep searching for it.

Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 14:35 BST (UK)
Census 1891 @ 39 Woodstock St
HESTON Edward      45y       b. Ireland
HESTON Ellen          53y       b. Ireland
HESTON Patrick       13y       b. Liverpool
HESTON Mary          11y       b. Liverpool

Census 1901  @ Penryhn St
KENNEDY John   23y  gas stoker    b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Mary   21y                     b. Liverpool
KENNEDY James  1y                      b. Liverpool
HESTON Ellen     57y  married charwoman   sister    b. Ireland.
(husband Edward is in the Liverpool Workhouse)


Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St (same Street as Daniel KENNEDY with the niece and nephew) is John KENNEDY, wife Mary and three sons. Also, Peter KENNEDY, 22 years, boarder, all born Liverpool.


KENNEDY, John  mms.  MCGRADY     
1877  JQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 28

KENNEDY, Daniel mms.   MCGREADY     
1882  JQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  Page 65

KENNEDY, Catherine Christina   MCGRADY     
1885  MQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 24

KENNEDY, Stephen  mms.    MCGRADY     
1886  SQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 60   

KENNEDY, Peter    mms.   MCGRADY     
1888  SQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pge 38

FreeBDM JQ 1878 Liverpool  Vol 8b pg410
KENNEDY James  m. Ellen McGRADY
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: carol8353 on Thursday 11 October 18 14:38 BST (UK)
My goodness I go off to have lunch and you've virtually solved the puzzle  ;D
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 15:11 BST (UK)
Wow!  :o I need a drink to assimilate all this info. Thank you again for everyone's time and efforts. It is really amazing to be offered so much help in the puzzle of the James Kennedy's!

So can we assume, so far we have:

James Kennedy (b circa 1851) married one Mary SMITH in 1870 and had sons John (1874) and James (1876)

Then with perhaps something happening to his wife, he remarried in 1878 Ellen MCGR(E)ADY and they go on to have John (1877 - a year before their marriage though?) Daniel, Catherine, Stephen and Peter?

Thank you!  :)
Mx
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 15:12 BST (UK)
James Kennedy married Ellen McGrady at St Alban's on 10 June 1878 - so perhaps not his first wife

This is becoming an interesting line!
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: wivenhoe on Thursday 11 October 18 15:45 BST (UK)


At my reply#43 I have edited -

Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St (same as Daniel KENNEDY with the niece and nephew) is James KENNEDY, wife Mary and three sons. Also, Peter KENNEDY, 22 years, boarder, all born Liverpool.

to be -
Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St (same Street as Daniel KENNEDY with the niece and nephew) is
......... John........... KENNEDY, wife Mary and three sons. Also, Peter KENNEDY, 22 years, boarder, all born Liverpool.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: candrjm on Thursday 11 October 18 15:50 BST (UK)
Quote
So can we assume, so far we have:

James Kennedy (b circa 1851) married one Mary SMITH in 1870 and had sons John (1874) and James (1876)

Then with perhaps something happening to his wife, he remarried in 1878 Ellen MCGR(E)ADY and they go on to have John (1877 - a year before their marriage though?) Daniel, Catherine, Stephen and Peter?

Not if this is Mary (nee Smith) and James Kennedy in the 1881 census which I posted earlier:


https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27L-M86Q


Possible marriage:

Marriages Sep 1874

Kennedy    James         Liverpool    8b   453   
Smith    Mary Ann         Liverpool    8b   453


Childrens birth registrations:

KENNEDY, JAMES        SMITH     
GRO Reference: 1876  S Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 6

KENNEDY, CHARLES        SMITH     
GRO Reference: 1878  D Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 17

KENNEDY, WILLIAM        SMITH     
GRO Reference: 1880  D Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 57



The James Kennedy son of James and Ellen in this list was born in 1878

Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St (same as Daniel KENNEDY with the niece and nephew) is James KENNEDY, wife Mary and three sons. Also, Peter KENNEDY, 22 years, boarder, all born Liverpool.


KENNEDY, John  mms.  MCGRADY     
1877  JQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 28

KENNEDY, Daniel mms.   MCGREADY     
1882  JQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  Page 65

KENNEDY, Catherine Christina   MCGRADY     
1885  MQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 24

KENNEDY, Stephen  mms.    MCGRADY     
1886  SQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 60   

KENNEDY, Peter    mms.   MCGRADY     
1888  SQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pge 38

FreeBDM JQ 1878 Liverpool  Vol 8b pg410
KENNEDY James  m. Ellen McGRADY




perhaps your James Kennedy was a different one to the one who married Mary Smith and your James Jnr was a little younger than you thought


Edit: Sorry just noticed that's a marriage for James and Ellen in 1878 not a birth for a James
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 15:53 BST (UK)
Quote
Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St

I think that should read 18 Dryden Street.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 16:04 BST (UK)
Census 1891 @ 39 Woodstock St
HESTON Edward      45y       b. Ireland
HESTON Ellen          53y       b. Ireland
HESTON Patrick       13y       b. Liverpool
HESTON Mary          11y       b. Liverpool

Census 1901  @ Penryhn St
KENNEDY John   23y  gas stoker    b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Mary   21y                     b. Liverpool
KENNEDY James  1y                      b. Liverpool
HESTON Ellen     57y  married charwoman   sister    b. Ireland.
(husband Edward is in the Liverpool Workhouse)


Census 1911, at 15 Dryen St (same Street as Daniel KENNEDY with the niece and nephew) is John KENNEDY, wife Mary and three sons. Also, Peter KENNEDY, 22 years, boarder, all born Liverpool.


KENNEDY, John  mms.  MCGRADY     
1877  JQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 28

KENNEDY, Daniel mms.   MCGREADY     
1882  JQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  Page 65

KENNEDY, Catherine Christina   MCGRADY     
1885  MQ LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 24

KENNEDY, Stephen  mms.    MCGRADY     
1886  SQ  LIVERPOOL  Vol 08b  pg 60   

KENNEDY, Peter    mms.   MCGRADY     
1888  SQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pge 38

FreeBDM JQ 1878 Liverpool  Vol 8b pg410
KENNEDY James  m. Ellen McGRADY



Just also noticed that James Kennedy (b1851 circa) was living in Woodstock Street when his son James marries Julia McCarthy in 1897...
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: ShaunJ on Thursday 11 October 18 16:09 BST (UK)
Quote
Just also noticed that James Kennedy (b1851 circa) was living in Woodstock Street when his son James marries Julia McCarthy in 1897...

No it was son James who lived at Woodstock Street. The marriage register does not record the father's address.
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Thursday 11 October 18 16:12 BST (UK)
Possible marriage:

Marriages Sep 1874

Kennedy    James         Liverpool    8b   453   
Smith    Mary Ann         Liverpool    8b   453


That possible marriage record - I found one Kennedy Mary Smith Liverpool 8b 318 for 1870! Not sure where now!  :-[
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: candrjm on Thursday 11 October 18 16:41 BST (UK)
do you mean this one!

Marriages Jun 1870 
Kennedy    Mary        Liverpool    8b   318    
Smith    Samuel         Liverpool    8b   318   
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Horsley2016 on Friday 12 October 18 08:25 BST (UK)
do you mean this one!

Marriages Jun 1870 
Kennedy    Mary        Liverpool    8b   318    
Smith    Samuel         Liverpool    8b   318

Ah! I see my mistake!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: candrjm on Friday 12 October 18 14:09 BST (UK)
This might be worth a closer look!

Birth (no mother's maiden name recorded so possibly illegitimate child of Ellen McGrady):

MCGRADY, JAMES        -      
GRO Reference: 1874  D Quarter in LIVERPOOL  Volume 08B  Page 177    

Is this the family in the 1881 census:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27L-MPVR






 

Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: Millmoor on Friday 12 October 18 14:34 BST (UK)
Following on from the above post  there is this baptism:

St Nicholas ,Liverpool

Born 23 Dec  1874 Baptised 24 Dec 1874

Jacobus McGrady Mother Helena McGrady (No father shown).

(On the same page of baptisms it looks like she is recorded as a Godmother of Joseph McDonell, baptised the following week).

William
Title: Re: Missing the obvious or not?
Post by: navarrom on Monday 17 June 19 00:21 BST (UK)
.