1
The Common Room / Literacy in London versus the north
« on: Monday 26 March 18 21:00 BST (UK) »
Although the major part of my family research has been in the midlands and the north, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire, West Midlands, Lancashire and Yorkshire, I have more recently been researching family in London.
What strikes me is that most of the northern research tells me that my working class ancestors in the 19th Century were illiterate and signed the marriage registers with a 'mark'. In London, although I found family who were obviously extremely poor and living in areas renowned for poverty, Bethnal Green, Shoreditch, Clerkenwell etc, most seemed to be able to at least sign the marriage registers. Although this not prove they were fully literate, I find the difference striking.
Does anyone know why this would be the case? I wondered whether it was because of a greater prevalence of charities in the capital?
What strikes me is that most of the northern research tells me that my working class ancestors in the 19th Century were illiterate and signed the marriage registers with a 'mark'. In London, although I found family who were obviously extremely poor and living in areas renowned for poverty, Bethnal Green, Shoreditch, Clerkenwell etc, most seemed to be able to at least sign the marriage registers. Although this not prove they were fully literate, I find the difference striking.
Does anyone know why this would be the case? I wondered whether it was because of a greater prevalence of charities in the capital?