19
The Common Room / Dead Wife's Sister Act - and bigamy?
« on: Monday 25 September 23 12:14 BST (UK) »
This old thread partially answers my question: https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=498893.msg3556573#msg3556573
A man in our family married Harriet in 1888, but she died in 1898. He then married Harriet's sister Miriam in 1901. That marriage was clearly unlawful because the Dead Wife's Sister Act was not repealed until 1907. Q1 - would there be any need for annulment documentation, or would they simply have ignored the marriage registration?
He then married again (someone else, unrelated) in 1904.
Q2. Since he had already married, even if unlawfully, and Miriam believed she was his wife and was still living, would this have constituted bigamy?
He behaved disgracefully in abandoning Miriam - but what was the legal position?
A man in our family married Harriet in 1888, but she died in 1898. He then married Harriet's sister Miriam in 1901. That marriage was clearly unlawful because the Dead Wife's Sister Act was not repealed until 1907. Q1 - would there be any need for annulment documentation, or would they simply have ignored the marriage registration?
He then married again (someone else, unrelated) in 1904.
Q2. Since he had already married, even if unlawfully, and Miriam believed she was his wife and was still living, would this have constituted bigamy?
He behaved disgracefully in abandoning Miriam - but what was the legal position?