Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KathMc

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 338
19
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: DNA results - the truth will out
« on: Wednesday 12 November 08 11:18 GMT (UK)  »
What fantastic news for your husband. I hope it is for the whole family.

Kath

20
United States of America / Re: 1870 census lookup please KIDD
« on: Sunday 09 November 08 15:42 GMT (UK)  »
Oh yay! I love when this happens. Welcome Laura. Can't wait to see how this turns out.

Kath

21
United States of America / Re: Don't know where to start
« on: Sunday 09 November 08 10:57 GMT (UK)  »
You know that he lost a lot of money in the Wall Street Crash, but how do you know that? Is there some family story behind that and if so, are there any clues as to where he settled in the US, where he might have worked, how he got the money?


22
The Common Room / Re: Is this normal?
« on: Friday 07 November 08 13:18 GMT (UK)  »


The other thing I was thinking of was that after the Great War, so many young men had been killed that quite large numbers of women never married, simply because there weren't enough men to go round. That won't have applied to every generation, but might account for one or two of yours.

That's a great point. I hadn't thought of that regarding so many of my unmarried ladies. I know at least one "stayed on the farm" and ran it with a brother who never married, but she would have come of age long before WWI, anyway.

23
The Common Room / Re: Is this normal?
« on: Friday 07 November 08 10:20 GMT (UK)  »
Di, I have this too on two branches in particular. Supposedly, my gg grandfather had many siblings who all perished due to the potato famine. He, as sole survivor, had 7 children. Of those 7 children (3 girls and 4 boys), 2 of the boys married, and only one had children, my g grandfather, who had 6 children, 5 of whom lived to ripe old adulthood. Of these (2 boys and 3 girls), the 2 boys married. My grandfather had 4 (maybe 5 not proven -- sshhh) children and my great uncle had 2 daughters, who never married. From the 4 children of my grandfather, however, there are 21 children and I can't even count how many grandchildren and great-grandchildren now.

My other branch, the Murphys, is a little more complicated, but it all seemed to narrow down. There were 6 brothers, one never married and 4 were married at least 2 times. They all had many children, my gg grandfather having the fewest at 5. We are finding, as we research this family, that in each generation, there was only one or two who had children, and so on and so on.

I've always found this to be fascinating, even before I got so obsessed with genealogy, how my branch was it. I couldn't really explain it. There are a lot of nuns and some priests in these two branches, but beyond that, not sure why. Both of these branches were also quite educated, so maybe that plays a part in it.

Great topic. thanks for bringing it up.

Kath

24
US Lookup Requests / Re: Samuel Charles Owen Foreman
« on: Monday 03 November 08 21:41 GMT (UK)  »
I know. I wonder about that. I had some rather elderly (for the times) relatives who made the trip also and I have often wondered what made them go. Very scary, and courageous.

25
The Common Room / Re: Any Tips For Searching For Living Relatives
« on: Monday 03 November 08 21:27 GMT (UK)  »
 ;)

26
US Lookup Requests / Re: Samuel Charles Owen Foreman
« on: Monday 03 November 08 21:26 GMT (UK)  »
Are they the ones in 1881 in Garston, Lancs? If so, by 1900 they weren't young'uns, were they? Maybe they didn't survive much longer after their trip.

Kath

27
US Lookup Requests / Re: Samuel Charles Owen Foreman
« on: Monday 03 November 08 18:49 GMT (UK)  »
Great, keep us posted. And let us know if you need anything else.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 338