Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dinkydidy

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 48
64
Northumberland / Re: Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Tuesday 27 February 18 23:07 GMT (UK)  »
Sorry to have put you to so much trouble Jen & David, but now I'm puzzled as well. I am an LDS church member, and I still get the locked message on many films when trying to view them at home. There must be different restrictions imposed by different copyright holders in various areas.

Obviously, I have been able to access the Felton one at home, but the contents are as per the attached snip, including dates, not including them, and back to including them, just for that year.

65
Northumberland / Re: Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Tuesday 27 February 18 12:50 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for your interest Jen, but it's nearly pumpkin time here in South Australia, and I have to go to bed.

66
Northumberland / Re: Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Tuesday 27 February 18 12:46 GMT (UK)  »
The annoying thing is that I haven't yet found a way to effectively fast forward through hundreds of images. I scroll down and check the visible dark covers to see where I'm up to. Then, when you're close, you can do multiple clicks.

1768 marriages are at image 258/9 of 689.

67
Northumberland / Re: Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Tuesday 27 February 18 12:41 GMT (UK)  »
I've just looked at the transcripts, which at that time were patchy & incomplete. For 1768 there is only a list of burials.

To access the register images you need Search>Catalog, then enter the place only and click Search.

From the results, click on Church records. The resulting list includes the CofE BTs, but the Parish Registers are at the end of the list.

68
Northumberland / Re: Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Tuesday 27 February 18 11:54 GMT (UK)  »
Many are the original registers, and in this case you can see the actual volumes and covers. The catalog entry generally states when they are Bishop's Transcripts.

The thing is, he changes details halfway down a page, and back again overleaf.

69
Northumberland / Felton marriage dates 1768
« on: Monday 26 February 18 23:54 GMT (UK)  »
I may just be unlucky, but am wondering if there was a historical reason for dates not being included in a marriage register in 1768 - 1769. I have been looking at the digitised record on Family search, and the register for that time is, of course, all handwritten, with the banns dates and marriages all in chronological order within the one register.

I was after the marriage of James Storey and Sarah Robson in 1768. It's there, but like several others within about a year, simply says "were married in Felton Church by legal publication of banns in the year one thousand seven hundred & sixty eight by me W. Henderson, Vicar" then a statement about solemnization and witnesses. Not even banns dates!

The last recorded date is 22nd May 1768, then five marriages with the above statement, then he goes back to dating from one on the 18th May 1769. William Henderson was the vicar right through for many years, and there are no missing pages.

It seems odd that the period is a year almost to the day.  ???

Didy

70
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: First line please?
« on: Wednesday 14 February 18 00:06 GMT (UK)  »
Thank you. I know he was seeking free treatment, but that isn't mentioned anywhere in the document. Perhaps the Government Hospital WAS free.

Didy

71
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / First line please?
« on: Tuesday 13 February 18 22:46 GMT (UK)  »
This is part of a petition for free entry to the government hospital in Cape Town in 1841, but I can't decipher the last couple of words in the top line. Someone has suggested "indoor patient", but the p in hospital, petitioner and pray is quite different.

I would appreciate any other suggestions.

Didy

72
The Common Room / Re: Inconsistent literacy
« on: Thursday 01 February 18 00:09 GMT (UK)  »
Being able to write only one's signature - in whatever form - may well be the coming thing. Where I live (South Australia) schools are no longer teaching cursive handwriting, and some of my well-educated, middle-aged children do not use it either. Keyboards and text-speak are rapidly making handwriting of any kind obsolete.

Didy

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 48