RootsChat.Com

Hi Julie

Sorry to be a pain in the butt - I haven't received it.  May I ask you to resend it please?

thanks and regards

Sarah

Could any one let me know who would hold copies of the local newspapers in Hartlepool in 1913?
And whoever holds them whether they would do a search to see if an obituary appears in any of the papers (I do have the death date).

If any one can pass on a web site/info that would be great thank you 

regards

Sarah

Hi Susan

You say Fanny re-married, do you have that cert or is it what you know from the family descendants.

In the 1881 census the family were together, in 1884 Fanny Warner had re-married.  In 1884 Fanny has moved from Long Crendon back to Chelsea (where she was born).

I searched all the marriages between 1881 and 1884 for Fanny Warner remarrying and through another researcher discovered that she had re-married using the name Fanny Brown.  I have the marriage certificate.  I researched the marriages to see if Fanny Warner had married a BROWN between 1881-1884 but she hadn't.

Through the same researcher who is related to the Warners we discovered that the 2 daughters on marrying used the surname BROWN declaring their father as James Brown.

I believe that George Warner left Fanny, I don't think there will have been a divorce but I will try your suggestion thank you...........perhaps the shame? caused her to re-marry using a different surname?

thanks for your help and sorry for taking so long in replying I have just got back from my jolly holidays 

thanks and regards

Sarah

Hi

Thanks for that I must confess that I have researched all Martha's born 1849-1853 in Long Crendon and traced them all through bmd's and census info.  I found Martha Cannon and her death in the 1870's.

George Warner (who is a descendant in my tree) was married and had 3 children and was in Long Crendon in 1881, by 1884 his wife had re-married using a different surname and given his 2 daughters a different surname (they also married using this different surname but through other family descendants they always claimed that they were Warners).  His first born son, who is also in the 1881 census has disappeared, can't find his birth or death.  I think that George and his wife separated and went on to lead different lives.

I have been unable to trace George in the 1891 census, I believe that the George Warner I have found in the 1901 census is him.  I don't think that he is married to the Martha that he is with and he has fibbed a little about the places of birth.  His age and occupation matches perfectly with my missing George Warner.

thanks again

 

Hi Ambly

Thank you very much have located them now!  Just can't find them after 1871! but am tracking them down!

thanks again

Sarah