Hi folks, I see I have had 43 views and no replies! I guess this means that the table function is not widely used. A shame as it would be very handy to quote info from census etc without infringing copyrights by posting an image.
I have started to do some research myself, and forgive me if some of the post that follow are along the 'thinking aloud' line!
Firstly, I have found this site, which does the work for us. Also, we can look at the generated code and use the info to hand-build our own tables:
http://www.teamopolis.com/tools/bbcode-table-generator.aspx Unfortunately, my first attempt has failed, or rather it has only half-worked, see below:
[th]First Name[/th] [th]Last Name[/th] [th]Relationship[/th] [th]Marital[/th] [th]Gender[/th] [th]Age[/th] [th]DOB[/th] [th]Occ[/th] [th]POB[/th]
|
William | Parry | Head | M | M | 33 | 1818 | Powerloom overlooker | Pendleton, Lancs |
Isabella | Parry | Wife | M | F | 25 | 1826 | - | Manchester |
The code generated was this:
[table]
[tr]
[th]First Name[/th]
[th]Last Name[/th]
[th]Relationship[/th]
[th]Marital[/th]
[th]Gender[/th]
[th]Age[/th]
[th]DOB[/th]
[th]Occ[/th]
[th]POB[/th]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]William[/td]
[td]Parry[/td]
[td]Head[/td]
[td]M[/td]
[td]M[/td]
[td]33[/td]
[td]1818[/td]
[td]Powerloom overlooker[/td]
[td]Pendleton, Lancs[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Isabella[/td]
[td]Parry[/td]
[td]Wife[/td]
[td]M[/td]
[td]F[/td]
[td]25[/td]
[td]1826[/td]
[td]-[/td]
[td]Manchester[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
It seems that the 'table header' field is not being interpreted correctly.. A cup of tea, then, and some more head-scratching....