Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GD40

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Thanks very much - I'll keep digging!

2
Hi,

Thanks for all your replies, but....

I'm still struggling with Alicia de la Pole (1480-1500) !

I have two lineages suggested for her - The first is with her mother being Jane Okeover (1496-1524) and her father as John de la Pole of Hartington (1509-1570). The trouble here is that Jane was born 16 years after Alicia's birth and John was born 29 years after her birth.

The second option is her mother is Elizabeth Plantagenet (1444-1504) and her father as John de la Pole 2nd Duke of Suffolk (1442-1492). At least with this pairing, the dates allow a possibility, but I can't find any definite proof.

If anybody has any views on this, I would much appreciate their comments.

Alicia is doing my head in.

Cheers,

Geoff Deakin.

3
Hi Colin,

I have been trying to email you, but am unable to do so.

The second photograph is the correct one, and also appeared in the book 'Above the Heron's Pool'.

The information in the Dropbox is brilliant. I am going through it at the moment, and will let you know when I've finished.

Thanks again for all your help.

Cheers,

Geoff.

4
Thank you Nicol,

All extremely interesting.

Just one thing - The photograph of the wedding of Katherine Richardson and John Deakin in 1944 is not of them! Their wedding was in 1944 in Madras, and I have a similar photograph, but with different persons in it.

I've circulated it to the family for confirmation, but initially I am certain it is not my parents.

I'll come back to you if I find out more.

Cheers,

Geoff.

5
Hello Nicol,

That's a very comprehensive history of the Munro's you have dug up!

Re Katherine Richardson and John Deakin - I am their eldest son, born at Ashleigh, and 'returned' to England on the troopship R.M.S. Alcantara with my parents in February 1945.

I would be most interested in any other information you may have.

Thanks again.

6
I'm sorry for the long delay in replying.
I feel very guilty after all your hard work.
I think I am going to have to research with far more care in the future.
Thank you again.
With best regards,
Geoff Deakin.

7
I've just bought a very big magnifying glass!! and extended my membership of Ancestry to lifetime. (A joke, in view of the recent comments about Ancestry's records.)

8
Family History Beginners Board / Re: William Deakin
« on: Tuesday 30 April 19 23:29 BST (UK)  »
Hello Maiden Stone,

My apologies - The entry for Francis Deakin, dated 15 Feb 1652 is incorrect. It is a duplicate of 15 Feb 1682 and should be ignored.

I hope I haven't caused you too much grief.

I am doing this too late at night!!

9
Hi Everyone - Thanks for your input - It's all most intriguing!
cristeen:
I'm afraid I've implicitly trusted Ancestry Hints in the past, but will treat them with suspicion from now on!
Mort'n'Al:
Not just ladies "put it all about"! One of my great grandfathers, a Major General in India in the 1800's, enjoyed the company of a number of Bibis before he was married, who bore him four children!
Josephine and Maiden Stone  :
I'll renew my research of Alicia, but it is good to see her confirmed as a child of John Dakyns and Jane Okeover, with a sister Lucia.
I initially discovered her on Ancestry and then on My Heritage.
Thanks everybody for your help - Your enthusiasm is most heartening - Thank you.
Geoff.

Pages: [1] 2 3