Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dean1

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 72
1
Technical Help / Hackers - more prolific than ever it would appear
« on: Thursday 02 November 17 14:34 GMT (UK)  »
Hi All, I am very sad to post this BUT after quite a number of years doing my family Tree - I started by making enquiries on this website I think (and enjoying it) I have found a hacker - I have virtually nothing left on my Tree and the continued existence of my computer is
doubtful.   She has erased my memberships in my name.   I was thrown off FTF for mentioning her name - she had actually put her name on herself but I put it above where she had entered it, in larger letters and tried to point out that this person was a serial hacker - I was shown the door.   However, most of the folk on that website are lovely people and have e-mailed me offering help etc - this is brilliant BUT as soon as anything goes on my computer it is taken.   It was a complete blank when I went into it this morning.
A few weeks ago I reported the hounding, stealing of documents (paid for documents) etc to the Police - they would not let me make a statement.  They said "we don't investigate that sort of thing".  (Red rag to bull I am afraid)  - I contacted Action Fraud - they told me to go back and make sure I had their letter heading viewable in my hand  - absolute magic.  The officer I saw was very pleasant (not like the usual Wisbech Police) he took a complete statement and said he would do this, that and the other - I believed him:  Lesson 1 - don't put any faith in the police - they speak with
forked tongue.   I may be old but I don't like being patted on the head.  I have now been told I have to go and report it in Huntingdonshire - great stuff - I shall report it in the local press instead.  It is of course all too little, too late for me.   I even knew who she was and where she was currently living in N. Ireland - I also knew that her brother had just gone to prison (not for hacking).  Husband is incandescent as he already paid £75 to get computer fixed when she took all E-addresses etc.  This time it is the family Trees - devastated ............what a waste of my retirement. I don't think the computer will be repaired again - shall use library computers.   What is worrying of course is that all families E-addresses are on computer and that includes our children.   I have shed many tears over all of this and, deep down wish I could retaliate - don't know enough about computers, however.   I have yet to ask ancestry if they have copies of my Trees (x2 as many as most due to adoption) but don't want to know the answer as yet.
Well, we are moving from here soon, thank goodness - the only thing I wish we could take from here is the house which says it all.   Sue - how do I make a computer private - better late than never but probably crackable!

2
Derbyshire / Re: Rowland/Roland - Huguenots in Duffield, Derbyshire
« on: Friday 23 June 17 14:04 BST (UK)  »
That was a very interesting read - I am not convinced that my Rowland is part of the family you talk about but he may be of course.   He was a Tailor but so were many others and oddly, although there were many Rowlands in Stamford also and he definitely had some connection there, all his ?next of kin settled eventually in Nottinghamshire - shoe industry I suspect.
I may and it is not a definite, have found my James Rowland's birth in Edern, Merionethshire,Wales (he is supposed to be Welsh but not sure where that info came from).  The James I found was born to Ann and John Rowland.   It would appear that this James died and another child, male, was born and also named James - he, and his parents are next found in Stamford.   I am at the moment going through the original BMDs for Stamford but so far, other than finding a pauper child in Stamford - a James Rowland, I am no further on.   I did check the Derbyshire Rowlands and have a separate Tree I have put them on but I can't convince myself one way or the other that there is a connection with them.
I may be completely wrong here but I imagine those who were connected to the Hugenots would be RC - I know my chap was C of E.   He was also a bellringer of some note and I have tried tracing him through that with no result.  He was born in 1765ish (have found no birth record so far but have calculated from his age at death).   He died in Great Baddow, Essex.
I am checking Workhouse Records at the moment but nothing so far BUT - and I don't live all that far from Stamford where I have done some research in their library - so far I have not found a James Rowland - he did a lot of service with the Militia and my next move will be to try and get those records.   I did enquire about them BUT it was quoted as over £30 per hour to have a search done (they have loads of records) but I can visit, I am told, and do the search myself but it will still cost £30 per hour.................upwards and onwards, Sue

3
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Help with occupation, please
« on: Friday 16 June 17 17:11 BST (UK)  »
I also think he is a Tailor - Dean1

4
Monmouthshire / Re: James Rowland b c1763
« on: Tuesday 13 June 17 14:45 BST (UK)  »
I do believe I have found James Rowland after all these years searching (and I am not the only one).
If it is him, it was expected he would have been born in Wales or Stamford, Lincolnshire.
The James Rowland I found yesterday was born in Edern, Merionethshire, Wales - his parents were Ann and John Rowland.
Just to make things even better, parents moved to Stamford, Lincolnshire.
This is all thanks to the member who is posting census and bmds on here - I haven't even been able to thank him because a) can't remember his name and b) I can't find the entry he made.   Nevertheless, I am absolutely delighted - so many folk have been looking for him for so long.   Sue - a Happy Elderly Bunny

5
I am getting bored with DNA - I prefer to do plain old family searches.   I don't even bother to erase them, I just ignore them - I thought I had been searching for relatives not cells. zzzzz
Now where is that button to stop the adverts ......................

6
Sue/Dean1, maybe you can understand why some of us, especially anyone who is adopted, doesn't understand your view.

You are adopted, you discovered your birth family (whether or not you wanted to meet any of them), and you have done the family tree of your birth family - with the help of members of your birth family.

Others seem only to want the same thing. :)

Hi; Of course "others seem only to want the same thing" - perfectly natural that you want to know who you really are.
Once you have your original birth certificate (which I acquired rather late in life) it is reasonably easy to trace the family tree - it is then exactly the same process as for those who are not adopted - it is, of course, unfortunately, more difficult to confirm if natural relatives are all deceased.    I never wanted to meet my birth family except for my half brother - he, unfortunately, had been killed in a road accident so I never did get to meet him but, who knows, maybe he wouldn't have wanted to meet me.  The person who helped me was his wife and what a lovely lady she is. 
One of the big things I found whilst researching my natural family is that I felt guilty - guilty towards my adoptive parents who most definitely would not have understood my reasons for doing so.   They were not happy when my sister turned up .............coincidentally her name was also Susan!  Sue

7
I am sorry to say that despite all I have read on here I cannot see how it is relevant to someone who doesn't know who they are exactly because of adoption.
My husband has been asked by an eager American to have his DNA done - he flatly refuses and maintains that DNA continues to mean (for him) "DO NOT ASK!"   Sue

👎👎👎 🤔 I don't think that's a very helpful post at all - it's no good your being "sorry to say" etc ! You said it!!  You may indeed have been better not to!  If  I'm understanding you correctly Dean1, I think if you and/or your husband had been adopted, and didn't know who your birth parents and family were, and where they were from, it may very well have been relevant to you!!  It certainly would have been to me! If I had been adopted, I too would likely to be happy to follow the DNA choice! I was not adopted, and I am not at all interested in doing the DNA thing but that's my choice!  Everyone is entitled to make their own choices.

As for your previous post, re people being  "deceased anyway" - of course they are!  Otherwise there would nobody doing genealogy and familiy history! 

Time for you to walk in someone else's shoes perhaps. 

Hi, I feel I am entitled to express my opinion ALSO!   I did not put any details of myself on here other than that I was adopted.   It is a long story which I will not go into BUT when I was about 47 (I am now 76) I came home from a late shift at the local hospice where I worked, put my feet up on the settee and started to read the Crawley Observer which had been delivered that day - there was a large article in there about a girl who had been adopted and had spent years trying to find out "who am I" - her natural parents were the same as those on my original birth certificate.  I now have a sister, nieces and nephews ...............yes, I think would have liked to have SEEN my natural parents but not actually meet them - it is probably odd not to want to do this but it was not to be.  I agreed to go with my sister when she visited "our" mother but was not prepared to meet her.  Very shortly after my sister and I met she found out that our mother had recently died - no visit was, therefore, ever made.  My sister had actually made all the overtures to a daughter-in-law of our mother who actually rang me - she is a very nice person and without me seeking information she did give me quite a bit.
I should add at this point that IF YOU HAD GROWN UP IN THE FAMILY I GREW UP IN YOU WOULD NOT WANT A SECOND SET OF PARENTS WHOEVER THEY WERE I.E. THE ONES WHO GOT RID OF YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE VERSUS THE ONES WHO FELT YOU HAD "BAD BLOOD"!
Don't be too critical of me - I had to live that life.   I am also entitled to my own opinion.
I have done my "natural" family Tree rather than my adopted Tree and very interesting it is.
Dean1

8
I am sorry to say that despite all I have read on here I cannot see how it is relevant to someone who doesn't know who they are exactly because of adoption.
My husband has been asked by an eager American to have his DNA done - he flatly refuses and maintains that DNA continues to mean (for him) "DO NOT ASK!"   Sue

9
Hi:  I had a request from someone on here about me taking a DNA test - it was in 2016 - hadn't been on the website for ages so have only just seen it.
It says somewhere that it is particularly good for getting information for folk who were adopted - I don't quite understand the logic of that - if you don't know who your natural parents were and they are deceased anyway - what good would it do?

Sue

PS I don't get notifications on my E-mail that there is anything on here for me - is there I can get alerts?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 72