1
New Zealand Completed Requests / Lawrence Scott, or Strange?
« on: Saturday 24 August 13 06:45 BST (UK) »
I'm trying to get to the bottom of a possible mystery regarding my great grandfather, Lawrence Scott. He was born 22 Jan 1882 in Little Rakaia, and registered as the son of Samuel Francis Scott (abt 1830 - 1916) and Ann Cryer (1839 - 1925). He married Emma Catherine Kemp in 1909. As far as I know he was raised by Samuel and Ann, as they are listed as his parents on his birth and marriage certificates.
I had no reason to question this until few years ago, when I found a family tree that had Lawrence Scott STRANGE, born 22 Jan 1882, married to Emma Catherine Kemp, and it said his parents were Frederick Strange and Mary Bell Marychurch. It appears to be the same Lawrence, with two different sets of parents. I have found no evidence to back up that the Stranges were his parents, but there must be some reason the two families would "claim" him.
The Scotts were definitely connected to the Strange family - Samuel and Ann Scott's eldest son Samuel Francis Scott (b. 1856) married Mary Bell Strange (b. abt 1870, daughter of Frederick and Mary Bell Strange) in 1890. Is it possible that this couple, very young (and unmarried in 1882), had Lawrence, and he was raised by one or both sets of grandparents? Or is the family tree I saw simply mistaken?
I had no reason to question this until few years ago, when I found a family tree that had Lawrence Scott STRANGE, born 22 Jan 1882, married to Emma Catherine Kemp, and it said his parents were Frederick Strange and Mary Bell Marychurch. It appears to be the same Lawrence, with two different sets of parents. I have found no evidence to back up that the Stranges were his parents, but there must be some reason the two families would "claim" him.
The Scotts were definitely connected to the Strange family - Samuel and Ann Scott's eldest son Samuel Francis Scott (b. 1856) married Mary Bell Strange (b. abt 1870, daughter of Frederick and Mary Bell Strange) in 1890. Is it possible that this couple, very young (and unmarried in 1882), had Lawrence, and he was raised by one or both sets of grandparents? Or is the family tree I saw simply mistaken?