1
Merionethshire / Did they marry in 2 separate churches on the same day ?
« on: Sunday 03 February 13 18:08 GMT (UK) »
I have found a marriage for my 4xggrandparents in 2 separate parish registers. They appear to have married in both Llandanwg and Llanenddwyn on the same day - 30 August 1779 !! I’m fairly sure that it is the same couple. Here are the records:
MARRIAGE, Llandanwg
Hugh Griffith of the Parish of Dolgellau Batchelor and Mary Griffith of this Parish Singlewoman were married in Church by License this 30th Day of August in the Year One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Nine by me Hugh Pryse, Rector.
This Marriage was solemnised between us Hugh Griffth, The mark of Mary Griffith
In the Presence of Rees David, Owen Robert.
MARRIAGE, Llanenddwyn
Hugh Griffith of the Parish of Dolgellau Batchr. and Mary Griffith of this Parish Spinster were married by Banns the 30th Day of August [1779]
Can anyone tell me if this is likely (wild guesses accepted!). Would they have rushed from one parish to the next to marry? If so, why? Or could the parish registers be wrong? Is there any significance to one marriage being by license and one by banns?
One other point - Hugh Griffith wrote his name very neatly but he was described in the parish records for the baptism of one of his children as ‘Labourer’. I suppose he may not have been fully literate, he might only be able to write his name, but would many labourers able to write in the late 1700s and where would he have learned to write?
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Ninian
MARRIAGE, Llandanwg
Hugh Griffith of the Parish of Dolgellau Batchelor and Mary Griffith of this Parish Singlewoman were married in Church by License this 30th Day of August in the Year One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Nine by me Hugh Pryse, Rector.
This Marriage was solemnised between us Hugh Griffth, The mark of Mary Griffith
In the Presence of Rees David, Owen Robert.
MARRIAGE, Llanenddwyn
Hugh Griffith of the Parish of Dolgellau Batchr. and Mary Griffith of this Parish Spinster were married by Banns the 30th Day of August [1779]
Can anyone tell me if this is likely (wild guesses accepted!). Would they have rushed from one parish to the next to marry? If so, why? Or could the parish registers be wrong? Is there any significance to one marriage being by license and one by banns?
One other point - Hugh Griffith wrote his name very neatly but he was described in the parish records for the baptism of one of his children as ‘Labourer’. I suppose he may not have been fully literate, he might only be able to write his name, but would many labourers able to write in the late 1700s and where would he have learned to write?
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Ninian