Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - rich23434565

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6
1
Hi everyone -

I recently had my mum take an Ancestry DNA test. I've traced most of her family tree back to the mid-18th century at least and almost everyone came from either rural Gloucestershire, Hampshire or Sussex.

There was one obvious exception and that was her greatx2 grandmother on her mother's side. The gtx2 grandmother was called Isabella Mealy. She was born on the island of St Helena in 1824 but wasn't baptised until Oct 1826. The parish register records her birth and baptism as 'the daughter of John Mealy, St Helena Rgt, and Mary his wife'.

John Mealy married Mary Bray in June 1826 on St Helena, two years after Isabella [and her sister, Eleanor] was born so I've no idea if John Mealy was her biological father. I've always assumed that he was, that he had two children with Mary Bray prior to their marriage, but that the children weren't baptised until after the marriage.

When Mary Bray got married she is referred to in the parish register as "free". Many other women are referred to as "spinster" or "widow", and I'd been told by St Helena researchers that "free" was often used to indicate women who were non-slaves but of non-European origin.

When John Mealy joined up with the East India Company's St Helena Regiment in 1813, he said that he came from Ireland, which made sense as apparently Mealy is an Irish surname, derived from O'Malley.

Apart from the fact that John Mealy and Mary Bray had a son on St Helena and that the family eventually moved back to Ireland, I know almost nothing else about them. So I hoped that the Ancestry DNA test would offer some new ideas.

I expected the results to show something like 95% 'English' with some Irish and possibly something from a non-European source [i.e. Mary Bray]. The reason I got my mum tested rather than me is because she's closer, genetically, to the people on St Helena and I'm of Indian descent via my father and didn't want that to cloud any non-European result.

The ethnicity estimate identified:

77% England [with genetic communities in Gloucestershire and Sussex, as expected]

12% [North East] Scotland [range between 0%-15%]
6% Germanic Europe [range between 0%-26%]
5% [Western] Wales [range between 0%-10%]

I've not found anyone on my mum's side of the tree from Germany, Scotland or Wales. Almost everyone has come from Gloucestershire, Sussex or Hampshire apart from this couple on St Helena.

I know the ethnicity estimates get a bad press, and seem to be regarded as worthless, but is there anything I can take away from these results? Would non-European DNA from a gtx3 grandmother even show up? Can the lack of Irish dna be taken as evidence that John Mealy wasn't the father at all?

Thanks for reading   :-*

2
Hi - I'm still using the 2005 Family Tree Maker program [which works fine for my purposes] but I've decided to upload my tree to Familysearch and FS only accepts Gedcom files.  :-\

My Family Tree Maker program won't allow me to export my 'FTW Family File' as a 'Gedcom' file. The option is greyed out.

If I send the FTW Family File [it's about 3.3MB] to a forum user, could they upload it into a different version of Family Tree Maker, export it as a Gedcom file and then send me the Gedcom file?

I'd be very grateful and it would save me spending £50 on new software I don't really need.

Yours hopefully
Rich

3
Europe / Translating/Deciphering Dutch ondertrouw entries from the 1600s
« on: Saturday 20 June 15 00:51 BST (UK)  »
Hi - I wonder if any Dutch speakers could have a look at these three entries from the Amsterdam ondertrouwregisters. I know the names of the individuals who pledged to marry but many of the other details complete elude me:

1: 22nd May 1627

Jans Ponssen of __
&
Annetje Marcus of Amsterdam - 29 years old - with Markus de Rueel

That's about all I can make out unfortunately.


4
The Common Room / A 37-Year Gap Between Death and Probate: Why?!
« on: Friday 22 May 15 12:34 BST (UK)  »
This is a mystery at the moment and I've no idea what could've been going on.

The parish register for Chedworth in Gloucestershire records the burials of Robert Coats and Edith Avery in 1670/71:

"Robert Coats was buried the fifth day of January 1670
Edith, the wife of Henry Avery was buried the 8th day of January 1670 - She was the daughter of the said Robert Coats".

So Edith Avery was the daughter of Robert Coats and the wife of Henry Avery. I know Edith Coates married Henry Avery at Chedworth in 1664 and that she was baptised c1643.

And then in 1708 an inventory of Edith's estate suddenly appears in the records entitled "the personal estate of Edith Avery, deceased, late the wife of Henry Avery of Chedworth, cordwainer, and Robert Coats, deceased, late of Chedworth". The inventory was compiled in 1708 by Henry Avery.

The record of probate also survives, dated 09 Feb 1708 (it's in Latin but I can make out that Edith was Henry Avery's wife and Robert Coats' daughter.)

Why would Edith Coats be buried in 1670/71 and then a receipt of probate and inventory appear in 1708? Henry Avery, the husband, didn't die until 1723.

Any ideas?  :)




5
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Help with name on will of 1621
« on: Thursday 14 May 15 16:14 BST (UK)  »
Hello  :)

Has anyone got any ideas what the name of the witness is on the left? It's from the will of Joan Adeane of Temple Guiting made in 1621. Her name, 'Joan Adean', with her mark, is on the right.

The name on the left is that of a male and it looks like his surname could also be Adean, although I'm not completely convinced of that. As for the first name, it could begin with an 'F' but other than I've no idea. It looks like Fardmauesa but obviously it isn't  ;D






6
The Common Room / Joining the dots between 1702 marriage and 1680 baptism
« on: Wednesday 29 April 15 00:24 BST (UK)  »
I've spent a long time trying to trace the wife of John Young of Withington in Gloucestershire. I knew she was called Eleanor and that the marriage took place c.1700 in Gloucestershire. I finally found it:

"John Young of Withington & Elioner Gutheridge of Northleach by Licence"

The marriage took place in Gloucester at the church of St Mary de Crypt. Withington is some 15 miles from Gloucester and Northleach, the bride's alleged parish, is around 20 miles from Gloucester, so the couple had to travel some distance to get married at St Mary de Crypt. Almost every marriage on the same page (30 or so) was by licence but I don't think that's significant.

I've struggled to find Elioner Gutheridge's baptism though. It's an unusual name (Gotheridge and Goodrich are alternative spellings that I've come across) and the only one I can find is this:

"Elianora fil: Thoma et Elizabetha Gotheridge: 12 August 1680"

And yes, the baptism took place at St Mary de Crypt in Gloucester, the exact same church where John Young and Eleanor Gutheridge were married in 1702. The location, the name and the year or birth dovetail perfectly with marriage in 1702.

I'd love to claim that the child baptised in 1680 and the bride of 1702 are the same but the fact that she claimed Northleach as her parish, so far from Gloucester, bothers me. And I'm always aware, the further you go back, of the increasingly poor coverage of the records. Just because it's the right name doesn't mean it's necessarily the right person. I've checked the St Mary de Crypt register and it doesn't appear that the child called Eleanor Gutheridge died in infancy.

Given these names and dates and the shared location, if you were me, would you assume that the two Eleanor Gutheridges are one and the same person?

Rich


7
This is from the Miserden Parish Register in Gloucestershire. The year is 1605 and it reads:

"the 25th day of May was buryed Anthonye Occould..." but what do you think are the two words that come after?

I believe the first one is "alias" and then maybe "Smythe"?

I just can't make it out and it's sort of important. An Anthony Occould was baptised at Miserden in 1601 and I'm trying to work out if the baptism and the burial are records of the same individual or of someone else. Would a four-year-old child be called 'alias'? The register is inconsistent but when a child dies it often refers to the child's father, so I'm inclined to think this Anthony Occould was an adult.

Any suggestions welcome!

Rich

ETA: right-click and select vue image if it looks too big to be seen in full :)

8
Hi all:

If anyone is going to be in the Gloucestershire Archives in the near future could you please do me a huge favour and check the Bishop's Transcripts for Shipton Oliffe for the BMDs relating to the surname 'Oliffe' (or 'Olliffe, Olliff, etc.).

I've accessed the parish registers online but they only exist from 1666 onwards.

The BTs I'm interested in cover the years: 1571-79, 1616, 1618, 1621-25, 1636, 1665

I'd be extremely grateful!

Rich  :)

9
Armed Forces / Attesting Twice in the 1890s
« on: Friday 17 October 14 01:42 BST (UK)  »
Hi all:

I've got two sets of militia attestation papers, one from 1895 and one from 1897.

The 1895 set has George Hayden born c1877 in Northamptonshire joining The Rifle Brigade militia. He was living at 57 Morning Lane in Homerton, London, at the time. His occupation was "Stoker".

The 1897 set has George Hayden born c1877 in Homerton, London joining the Middlesex Regiment militia. He was living at 7 Belshaw Street, Homerton at the time. His occupation was "Carman".

In both sets George Hayden claimed that he had never served in the militia/armed forces, etc. before.

The first George Hayden (1895) remained with the Rifle Brigade militia until January 1902 when he was discharged, receiving the South Africa medal. He was 'on leave' in 1897 and 'unfit' in 1898.

The second George Hayden (1897) declared quite explicitly that he had never been part of the armed forces/militia when he signed up in 1897. His service record just peters out. It ends with 'Absent 1898 - Liable to serve an additional year', and that's it. No discharge date, nothing.

Both men have scars on their foreheads and tattoos on their forearms. Both are similar heights and have the same colour hair and eyes. Their signatures are almost identical and they cited addresses where known members of their family were living.

Why do you think he changed his place of birth from Northamptonshire to Homerton? Why didn't he declare that he'd served with the Rifle Brigade militia when he signed up again in 1897?

Were people allowed to sign up for two separate militias at the same time?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6