Thanks for the replies...i really appreciate the feedback!
I looked over things again, and it was my 4th GGF, who may have been full NA (Cherokee is what were told as kids, born in 1796). He did marry a woman who didn't appear to be NA...but honestly who knows at this point. And, it wasn't' a direct male line...his daughter, my 3rd GGGM married my 3rd GGGF. He certainly wasn't NA.
I understand how "watered down" the line gets through generations of procreating. But how my daughter has it 1-2% in her results, yet i do not....it's crazy (to me anyway).
I've read (not a great deal) about the difficulties in tracing NA DNA. I've also read about the varying migration paths, and potential origins, and who may have came from what part of the world...the "Asian NA" vs the "Euro NA"...after a while it gets to be too much.
I'm mostly Euro West and Ire/Scot/Wales, which isn't a huge surprise....my daughter and i are super-white (especially in Winter), and have the golden hair
. Smaller percentages = Finland/NW Russia, Scandinavia, Iberian Peninsula, Euro South, Middle East, in this order.