Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tucson mike

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 17:38 BST (UK)  »
quite a strange situation - Scourfield St is the area close to Edge Hill station - a mile away from Sefton General Hospital - where both my sons were born - I am in Garston 4 miles from Scourfield st - so why would a lady go to Walton Neurological Hospital to give birth ??..about 8 miles away from Scourfield st - the only reason I can think of is that maybe Alice had an accident and suffered a head injury and that was why she was in Walton ??...do you know when Alice Stokes died ??

Alice appears to have been an unwed mother who wanted to have her child adopted. It's sounding like Walton, rather than Sefton, might have been the place for that in 1936.

2
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 17:30 BST (UK)  »
There was a workhouse on Rice Lane,,,it then became known as WAlton institute,,,then Walton hospital. Interestingly.....in 1904 the registrar general decided that if you were born in the workhouse,,,you no longer had to put this on the birth certificate,,,and you could instead put an ordinary street address,,or an invented one. Many workhouses used just one address for this purpose....so instead of saying on your birth certificate you were born in the workhouse,,,it would give the address. West Derby which covers the area you are interested in used this address on Workhouse birth certificates....107a Rice Lane. I think the workhouse had ceased to exist by 1936.. But maybe he was born in the institute or hospital...and they used a simalar address,,,just a thought.


Yes, that's helpful. The practice probably continued after the reason for it disappeared.

3
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 17:25 BST (UK)  »
The bigger picture here is that I have a DNA match with a woman living in greater Liverpool. We believe her grandfather was my uncle James. He married a Sarah Stokes but had mental problems already when they married, and was eventually put away. I was hoping this birth cert would list Sarah, not Alice, as the mother. Given the oddity of omitting the name of the hospital, though, I'm wondering how accurate the rest of the cert is!

I will look for adoption records and other birth records next. The RootsChat community is great. Thanks for your help!

4
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 17:08 BST (UK)  »
How long after birth was the child adopted?


Yes, the adoption part is a separate puzzle. I just received a copy of the birth cert I ordered from the GRO. "Adopted" is in the same handwriting as the rest of the information. The child was born on the 8th and the birth registered on the 22nd of August 1936. So the adoption seems to have been arranged before the birth was recorded. Since the father's name is not given, perhaps Walton Hospital arranged the adoption. 

5
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 16:52 BST (UK)  »
107 Rice Lane is what it says. The 7 has some curlicues & I mistook it for a 4. Sorry.

7
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 02:58 BST (UK)  »
OK, that's helpful. Thanks!

8
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 02:54 BST (UK)  »
Thank you for checking the Register. I do not know that the birth address was a residence, though. That's why I was hoping to find an old map or street directory of some sort, for an address-based lookup. I have a marriage cert where a street address is a hospital but the hospital name isn't in the cert.

9
Lancashire / Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
« on: Sunday 26 March 17 02:05 BST (UK)  »
Normal Stokes born to Alice Stokes, father's name not given, says "adopted* at right of cert.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10