Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - idontbelieveit

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Suffolk / Re: R..ROBINSON, LING, EADE - Suffolk
« on: Friday 20 November 20 14:17 GMT (UK)  »
I'd better get a copy of the marriage cert for Robinson/Ling. Marriage dates were:- and looking at the wrong chart my Great grandmother married George William Ling NOT David Ling! and that was 25th December 1895, Samuel Eade was c1895.
If I had a brain I would be dangerous.
Thanking all who replied

2
Suffolk / R Robinson, Ling, Eade - Suffolk
« on: Friday 20 November 20 11:35 GMT (UK)  »
 ???
I apologise if this is the wrong site - please let me know if it is and which one I need to contact if not.......
1881 Census states Rose A Robinson
1891 Census states Roseanna servant
1901 Census states Rosanna
1911 Census states Roseanna
My Great Grandmother is Ros(e)anna Robinson bc1875 Wenhaston d1922 and marrying a David Ling b1874 Blaxhall. This I have in my tree but since joining Ancestry well as Findmypast I have a concern which I could do with help.
In my tree her parents are George Robinson b1846 Wickham Skeith and Hannah Kerridge b1851 Bramfield.
In another persons published tree I have found Rose A Robinson bc 1875  Wenhaston with the same parents as above and same siblings as in my tree, but she marries a Samuel Eade b1872.
1881 Census states Rose A Robinson
1891 Census states Annie servant
1901 Census states Rose
1911 Census states Rose
Anybody any ideas please?
best regards

3
Suffolk / Re: THOMAS POOLEY - c1821 & c1824...Needham Market
« on: Friday 28 October 16 11:32 BST (UK)  »
Yep...just x-checked everything and merged thhe "two" diagrams for Thomas Pooley, and they do fit well. Thanks once again..just an idea for Eliza Pooley nee Pizzy's length of marriage being listed as 42 years in 1911 Census, in that husband Thomas died in 1903 so if it was actually 50 years ie listed years plus years since husbands death, then Fanny and Harry would not have been born out of wedlock? - just an idea
Once again many thanks for all your suggestions, research and guidance
best regards
Richard C

4
Suffolk / Re: THOMAS POOLEY - c1821 & c1824...Needham Market
« on: Thursday 27 October 16 09:56 BST (UK)  »
for Suzard & rosie99...Thank you very much for your replies. I will digest the infor youhave sent and cross-check my sources and past documentation
best regards

5
Suffolk / THOMAS POOLEY - c1821 & c1824...Needham Market
« on: Wednesday 26 October 16 13:21 BST (UK)  »
I "think" I have come up with a possible Uncle marrying a Niece scenario??
I have 2 x Thomas Pooley's born Needham Market c1821 and c1824.
Thomas Pooley 1821:- I have as single in 1841 Census, cannot find in 1851 nor 1861 Census's, 1871 married to an Eliza Pizz[e]y born c1839 and children, 1881 Census wife as Lizzie bc1839 and children, 1891 Census wife as Elizabeth bc1839,1901 Census as same and died c1903. In 1841 he was a Baker, whilst in the rest he was a Fishmonger.
Thomas Pooley 1824:- I can only find in 1851 and 1861 Census's. In 1842 married an Elizabeth Page  who died in 1850. Therefore 1851 Census declared as Widower with Niece Amelia and Nephew Patrick Pizz[e]y's. In 1861 Census declared as Widower with daughter Amelia and Niece Eliza Pizz[e]y born c1840.
Am I totally of-track here but if the Thomas Pooley's are the same in that all the Census years would be covered, and that the Eliza Pizz[e]y is the same, and there are only 2 Thomas Pooley's and both born Needham Market, and there is only one Eliza Pizz[e]y born 1839 ± 5yrs in Cotton (Bacton Sfk)?. I cannot find a marriage record with a Thomas Pooley marrying an Eliza Pizz[e]y though.
I am very confused as some might be reading this, but any help or pointers would be most welcome
regards
Richard C

6
Suffolk / Re: Suffolk Digests
« on: Wednesday 26 October 16 13:18 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for your response. Its a pity it is now defunct, so i'll put my enquiry onto here as a new subject.
regards
RC

7
Suffolk / Re: Suffolk Digests
« on: Monday 24 October 16 08:47 BST (UK)  »
SORRY I meant ROOTSCHAT

8
Suffolk / Re: Suffolk Digests
« on: Monday 24 October 16 08:46 BST (UK)  »
Yep I know...i'm just trying to solicit a response as to whether others who are also on rootsweb are having the same problem!

9
Suffolk / Re: Suffolk Digests
« on: Monday 24 October 16 08:31 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for the reply.., the "links" I am referring to are such as quotes suffolk@rootsweb.com , suffolk-request@rootsweb.com , suffolk-owner@rootsweb.com , etc end-quotes. As such "Subject: Digest Footer

To contact the SUFFOLK list administrator, send an email to
SUFFOLK-admin@rootsweb.com.

To post a message to the SUFFOLK mailing list, send an email to SUFFOLK@rootsweb.com."

Pages: [1] 2 3