Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KerrUSA

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 7
1
World War Two / Re: WW2 Ammunition Depot Marston Magna O-680
« on: Thursday 19 May 16 13:47 BST (UK)  »
BJ Bulldog Jr.,

Thanks for the note about the manor house.  Please do keep in touch.  Hopefully, we can meet in person when I'm in the Yeovil area, exchange a few "war stories", and allow me to thank you in person for your kind help.

2
World War Two / Re: WW2 Ammunition Depot Marston Magna O-680
« on: Thursday 19 May 16 13:40 BST (UK)  »
ScouseBoy,

The United States government is still awarding medals for World War II service that went overlooked, and the number of stories of absurd military policies is legion.  My own parents provide numerous examples.

After the Normandy invasion, both were transferred to France.  My father, who had been classified 4-F (unfit for duty due to his heart condition) prior to Pearl Harbour, was considered a non-combatant.  So in France, he was assigned to follow the retreating Germans and map the roads and bridges that had not been destroyed and those that could be used to deliver ammunition to the advancing front lines ... on BICYCLE!  And since he was a non-combatant, he was not issued any firearms, even though he often found himself behind enemy lines!

"The Army Way", he called it.   ;D

3
World War Two / Re: WW2 Ammunition Depot Marston Magna O-680
« on: Thursday 19 May 16 04:20 BST (UK)  »
ScouseBoy and JenB,

Thank you very much for the additional info and suggestions!  I can't begin to tell you how helpful it is and how deeply I appreciate it.

4
World War Two / Re: WW2 Ammunition Depot Marston Magna O-680
« on: Wednesday 18 May 16 20:33 BST (UK)  »
BJ Bulldog,

That is not only of interest, but it's timing couldn't have been more perfect!!!

Just two days ago I received a reply from the Haynes Motor Museum stating that, as far as they knew, NONE of the buildings from the Marston Magna depot were still standing.  I was disappointed to say the least, and had all but given up the idea of visiting the Yeovil/Sparkford area on my visit to the UK next month.

Your post has changed my mind!  The museum spokesperson did say that the Village pub that my father undoubtedly set foot in at least once is still standing.  Do you know if the manor house where he would have been billeted is also still there?  If so, then I have good reason to visit and photograph the area and will definitely add it to my travel itinerary!  I would also be interested in acquiring a copy of the book you referenced.

Hope to hear from you again soon.  If you wish to email me privately, my email address is len_pellman [at] yahoo.com.

5
Buckinghamshire / Re: Ranulph FITZALAN - Fact or Fiction?
« on: Sunday 01 March 15 22:16 GMT (UK)  »
Attached is a JPEG copy of page 150 of the Testamenta Vetusta, Volume 1, quoting the will of Sir William Arundel dated 01 August 1400.  His will omits any reference to children, and he leaves all of his estates to his "carnal" brother Sir Richard Arundel, his jewels to his widow, and his silverware to their nephew who was also named Sir William Arundel.  Not only does his will make no mention of children, but none are recorded elsewhere and several accounts mention him as either "childless" or "leaving no heirs".

We must conclude from this either that Ranulf/Ranulph was illegitimate and thus excluded from the will, or that he was the son of a different William FitzAlan/Arundel.

6
Buckinghamshire / Re: Ranulph FITZALAN - Fact or Fiction?
« on: Sunday 01 March 15 01:02 GMT (UK)  »
As PDF copies of these previously obscure records become more readily available, it is becoming abundantly clear that a Ranulph (with several variant spellings) FitzAlan, did in fact exist and was a son of a William FitzAlan.  The flanching of his arms strongly suggests an illegitimate descent, but the remaining question is whether is more than one William FitzAlan whose son he could have been.

I believe we'll uncover enough information in the next few years to make a definitive determination and settle the matter for even the most persistent skeptics.

7
Buckinghamshire / Re: Ranulph FITZALAN - Fact or Fiction?
« on: Sunday 07 December 14 02:04 GMT (UK)  »
Marilyn,  I would greatly appreciate receiving scanned copies and deeply appreciate your generosity.  My email address is len_pellman[at]yahoo.com (using the @ symbol of course).

8
Buckinghamshire / Re: Ranulph FITZALAN - Fact or Fiction?
« on: Saturday 13 September 14 04:29 BST (UK)  »
Strathbrook, spelling was not an exact science during the Middle Ages, so most names have multiple spelling variations.  Arundel and Arundell appear to have been used interchangeably for the Earls of that ilk.

However, I have also seen references to Arundells (usually with two l's) of Lanherne in Cornwall.  I know little about them, but found this link that gives some interesting information:

http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1386-1421/member/arundell-john-i-1366-1435

9
Dumfriesshire / Re: the "bloody" Bells from middlebie
« on: Monday 13 February 12 15:05 GMT (UK)  »
Not sure where my Bell ancestors might fit in ...

My great-great-grandmother was Mary Bell, daughter of James Bell and Helen (Neilson) Bell.  She was born 29 March 1826 in Branetrig, married David Kerr 05 November 1847.  I have not yet learned her date or place of death.

My great-great-great-great-great-grandmother was Janet Bell, born 04 July 1742 in Dumfries.  She married James Tweedie around 1764 and died 27 December 1808 in Mouswald.  I have not yet discovered the identity of her parents, nor how she and Mary Bell might be related.

Strictly speaking, however, neither appears to be from Middlebie.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 7