Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Digihound

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Re: LEEDS NEWS THEATRE - WW2
« on: Saturday 01 June 19 10:59 BST (UK)  »
Hi Bendywendy,

Just stumbled across your question by accident so I thought I'd log in to give you at least an initial reply.

The "News Theatre" was located in City Square, Leeds and was part of the Queens Hotel and City Station art deco building complex. I can recall visiting it regularly as a child in the early 1960s where they showed B and C rate movies and "Pathe News". I am a great lover of Art Deco architecture and I think that's where I got that passion.

It later changed its name to the Classic and then to the Tatler (an adults only cinema venue).

There are some old photos with descriptions on the Leodis site at:

http://www.leodis.net/display.aspx?resourceIdentifier=2004218_54516238
and
http://www.leodis.net/display.aspx?resourceIdentifier=2009811_169332&DISPLAY=FULL&COMMENT=YES
and
http://www.leodis.net/display.aspx?resourceIdentifier=20041210_19771975
and
http://www.leodis.net/display.aspx?resourceIdentifier=200836_166312

There is an article about News Theatres around the world and what they were at:

http://bufvc.ac.uk/newsonscreen/davidlean/news-theatres

There is an option for a paid article about news theatres in general at:

https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/JBCTV.2005.2.2.227

Hope that helps. You might have found some of these links already and want more personal information, but I'm afraid my memories of the News Theatre are rather vague.

Best wishes




2
Isle of Man / Mary BARR
« on: Sunday 13 January 13 19:21 GMT (UK)  »
Mary Barr was married to Stephen Maybury in Liverpool in 1821. On a later census her origin is shown as Isle of Man where she was apparently born around 1800 shortly followed by her sister Anne. But there is no evidence I can find of any reference to her in Manx documents. She may have come from Ireland via the Isle of Man, but there is no factual basis for this.
If anybody comes across any reference to her in Manx records, could you please respond to this thread.
Thanks

3
Occupation Interests / Coal Miners' Individual Employment Records
« on: Thursday 04 February 10 13:55 GMT (UK)  »
Hi,

Several of my ancestors on both sides of the family have been coal miners. This includes my grandfather, William Henry Maybury, who lived at Middlestown, West Yorkshire in the 1920s to 30s, and went over the fields in the Coxley Valley to a pit at Netherton (possibly Denby Grange, but not confirmed - there are another two in the immediate area.

Has anyone ever had any success in obtaining employment information about individual miners' employment from any source? He was not killed or injured, so he is not in those lists. There seems to be nothing in local Wakefield archives. Anybody been able to successfully obtain information from the NUM perhaps, or elsewhere?

All ideas welcome.
Thanks

4
The Common Room / Re: How to deal with a duplicate marriage?
« on: Thursday 04 February 10 01:21 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for your helpful comments.

The 1911 Census shows the Maybury family still in Colne, whilst Annie Maria Maybury/Cavill didn't die until 1928 in Wakefield. So if there is a Lancashire liaison, looks as though it had some history!

It's possible that the Wainwright/Hawkes in Lancashire is a previous marriage, I guess. Thanks for that titbit. It won't affect the core of my tree but it's interesting to know. It also gives an indication of a possible maiden name. I'll check that out.

Should I contact the local registrar at Wakefield to get clarification, or the GRO?

Thanks again

5
Technical Help / Re: buying computer
« on: Thursday 04 February 10 00:52 GMT (UK)  »
Hi,

For the majority of applications, both processors should do just fine, and you would probably notice little difference between them in practice. At one time Intel was miles ahead, and then AMD caught them up. Since then they've been neck and neck, each one dropping back over time.

The benefit of dual-core (and more recent quad core) processors is extra speed and the ability to run multiple demanding applications all at the same time. For the uses you've listed, I would agree that in practice it would probably make little difference for you.

Perhaps an important issue is what operating system your new computer will run. The newer the operating system, the greater demands it places upon the system, and the greater the amount of disk space needed. Memory is the most important. Windows 7 recommends 2Gb ram - but I would go for at least 4, even for your purposes, or you'll have to upgrade later. So if it's running Windows 7, then you'll need to start from a higher minimum specification. If you've found a system with Windows XP, bear in mind that it's now in the process of being phased out and only has a few years left, so you may want to upgrade later.

The most frustrating thing is slow operation, which can often be caused simply by a system giving a lot of its energy to redrawing the screen display. It's better to get a system with a separate graphics card, as this solves one of the biggest bottlenecks. This may sound technical, but it's fundamental.

But if you've got a reasonably fast computer with a reasonable amount of memory and a separate graphics card, then you should have no worries.

Hope that helps

6
The Common Room / How to deal with a duplicate marriage?
« on: Thursday 04 February 10 00:35 GMT (UK)  »
I'd just like to call on people's experience, please, to help me deal with something I've come across for the first time.

How can a marriage have apparently taken place twice several years apart?

My example is William Henry Maybury and Agnes Wainwright (aka Hawkes?)

Both entries are Hemsworth, Yorkshire West Riding. The first is Jan-Mar 1930 9c 235, and the second (adding the Hawkes alternative) is Jan-Mar 1934 9c 299.

I know I could solve the matter with copies of certificates, but there doesn't seem to be any transcription online, and I don't really want to spend out for a full copy at the moment.

Is this a registry error, a transcription error, an irregular first marriage that had to be repeated, a separate marriage entirely or what? ancestry.com comes up with both for WHM.

Can anybody shed any light on this please - and what does the word OR mean? Is it simply the alternative known surname (for example maiden name) or is it an acknowledged error?

Perhaps you've come across something similar before, or perhaps there are protocols I'm not aware of?

Thanks for your help.

7
Technical Help / Re: Why does Yahoo intervene ?
« on: Wednesday 13 January 10 23:28 GMT (UK)  »
Hi falcybe,

There doesn't necessarily have to be a "nasty" on an email you sent for a second email to be pulled out and held. They have a very tight anti-spam policy, so sometimes even if anyone sends just two emails in succession (without a length of time between them - sometimes as much as an hour) then it trips their spam filter.

Hi joboy,

I have searched through my PC using just the word 'Yahoo' and found just one folder which was created in 1999 that has about 120 files in it all waiting to be extracted ......... which I wont do ......... but there is no provision to delete any individual file nor the complete folder.

If you none of the files in the Yahoo directory have been installed, then you should just be able to select them (even compressed zip files) by left-clicking once and then pressing the delete key.

You should be able to do the same if you go to outside the directory itself, to delete the directory. If you've searched for the files and they come up in a list of files found, you should also be able to delete them there by this method - assuming you're using My Computer for the search (Start Button > My Computer)

But just to check - you aren't, or have not been a BT customer have you? As I indicated before, All BT's email is run by Yahoo, so it may be that this directory has been installed automatically by the BT setup if you are a BT customer.

8
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Minimum acceptable proof
« on: Wednesday 13 January 10 23:09 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for that helpful explanation Dobfarm.

Could I just clarify - does this mean I have to go to/contact the local library for the city in which the event took place?

Best wishes

9
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Minimum acceptable proof
« on: Wednesday 13 January 10 00:21 GMT (UK)  »
Hi again,

Thanks again for the extra posts.

I have created a furor! I'm glad to see I'm not the only perfectionist in tow - so Guy, your input has been particularly helpful. And - as I thought - sleep is at a premium for us all!

Just for the record, my only 'dud' was actually not a certificate, but a transcription from the UK 1911 census site, which cost very little comparatively. But I'm glad I said what I did, because otherwise I would not have known about the option to claim back for Dud certs.

Sorry, could you please clarify, Dobfarm - I can get marriage certificates from libraries...? Or do you mean I can get Parish registers that way - which have the same info?

James 1950 - that sounds a very good way of working. I'm using computer software, but where I include information on the system relates to how much certainty I have. So I guess we're operating with a similar style.

Best wishes


Pages: [1] 2 3