532
Scotland / Re: Quakers
« on: Saturday 08 June 19 11:36 BST (UK) »
Many thanks. Unfortunately, they're all too early for me! I'm guessing the birth I'm seeking was probably ca 1920, and no earlier than 1890.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
533
Scotland / Re: Quakers
« on: Friday 07 June 19 18:07 BST (UK) »
Many thanks for that info. I shall dig around to see if I can find what I want.
535
Devon / Re: Richard GARLAND c1771
« on: Wednesday 09 January 19 16:54 GMT (UK) »
OK. I shall do that shortly
536
Devon / Re: Richard GARLAND c1771
« on: Wednesday 09 January 19 12:05 GMT (UK) »
DOB7
Just noticed your interest in LILLYCRAP. I have a minor connection to that name; would you like details here or on another thread?
Just noticed your interest in LILLYCRAP. I have a minor connection to that name; would you like details here or on another thread?
537
Devon / Re: Richard GARLAND c1771
« on: Tuesday 08 January 19 17:19 GMT (UK) »
Concerning your 14.32, that would certainly account for Peter. So, are they cousins or brothers? Or, is Peter (the witness) the father of Richard (the groom)?
On your 15.56, yes, I've picked up both of those burials. Many thanks.
On your 15.56, yes, I've picked up both of those burials. Many thanks.
538
Devon / Re: Richard GARLAND c1771
« on: Tuesday 08 January 19 14:14 GMT (UK) »
Thanks.
It seems reasonable to assume that Peter and Richard were related, even that they were brothers. Therefore, Isaac and Sarah GARLAND must be Richard's parents. If so, why is there apparently no record of Richard's baptism? I'll see if I can find any other children of Isaac and Sarah.
Of some concern is the fact that, if Isaac and Sarah are my ancestors, I have not, as yet, found the name Isaac carried forward in the GARLAND family.
It seems reasonable to assume that Peter and Richard were related, even that they were brothers. Therefore, Isaac and Sarah GARLAND must be Richard's parents. If so, why is there apparently no record of Richard's baptism? I'll see if I can find any other children of Isaac and Sarah.
Of some concern is the fact that, if Isaac and Sarah are my ancestors, I have not, as yet, found the name Isaac carried forward in the GARLAND family.
539
Devon / Re: Richard GARLAND c1771
« on: Tuesday 08 January 19 12:21 GMT (UK) »
Having recently returned to the search after an enforced absence, I am still unable to find this ancestor despite all the data which has become accessible since my last visit. Can anyone help me now, please?
540
Cornwall / Re: Thomas Mitchell
« on: Tuesday 03 July 18 17:30 BST (UK) »
My knowledge of Thomas and Jane is strictly limited, but I can let you have what I believe I know about their descendants if you're interested.