1
Australia / Re: Mystery elphick
« on: Friday 23 May 25 05:43 BST (UK) »
A thought to consider.
If ELPHICK was not legally married to the mother of these children, the children would possibly be registered in her name, not his.
Nor would there be a death registered for the woman in the ELPHICK name and obviously not a marriage,
Alternatively, consider the possibility that children were not his (maybe some were, others not) and this would account for the lack of documentation in the ELPHICK name for the couple.
Sue
If ELPHICK was not legally married to the mother of these children, the children would possibly be registered in her name, not his.
Nor would there be a death registered for the woman in the ELPHICK name and obviously not a marriage,
Alternatively, consider the possibility that children were not his (maybe some were, others not) and this would account for the lack of documentation in the ELPHICK name for the couple.
Sue