4588
« on: Tuesday 01 February 11 21:45 GMT (UK) »
The 1841 census was taken much later in the year than the subsequent ones (shows those who spent the night of 6th June in a household), so the Parkneuk Wilson won't show up in it, though a widow, if there were one, might. Spinster is an occupation. Agents used to come round delivering flax and collecting the spun thread: a useful sideline. If a husband does not appear in the 1841 census, it may just mean that he was not at home that night - could be out at sea. The fishing families of Gardenstown and Crovie tended to marry amongst themselves and there are relatively few surnames in these places - lots of Watts, Wests, Wisemans etc. A grandfather of mine, Samuel Craik, was a fisherman there (he had an uncle with the same name) and just disappears after 1828, presumably lost at sea.
What I would do in your position is assume he was lost at sea between the birth of his last child and the 1841 census. In 1841 his wife is given an occupation, that suggests she is a widow as otherwise it might be left blank. The James Wilson looks like a son who is the main earner. Perhaps if his father had been alive and out at sea, James would have been in the same boat. The kirk session might have given the family something if it were in straightened circumstances. Also, if you have access to the microfilm roll for the Gamrie OPR, have a look at the baptism entries for other people. Who witnessed the baptisms of your family of Wilsons? See if you can find your William Wilson as a witness to other families' baptisms. When does he stop appearing?
Graham.