RootsChat.Com

Sorry to be back to Matthew and thank you for all your previous help and links which I followed and found out so much more, I really am most grateful.  Having done the research and reading a fair amount about transportation I now have a big question mark which you may be able to hoelp me with or tell me who could.
Matthew was transported to Tasmania for 10 years in 1840 for stealing 'pieces', a bolt of muslin.  He survived the journey and was of 'good conduct'.  In 1846 he was granted a Ticket of Leave and pardoned in 1849.  His wife, Jane, was similarly transported to Tasmania, for 10 years in 1842, again she survived the traumatic journey and according to the surgeon's report didn't need medical attention.  Her offence was handling stolen goods and a previous conviction for stealing cheese, poor dear. Again she was of 'good conduct'.  She was also pardoned in 1849 having served 7 years of her sentence.  I cannot find, as yet, a Ticket of Leave for her.
My question is this, most transportees were young, in their teens, twenties and thirties, but Matthew and Jane were comparitively old, 60 and 51 respectively, the oldest of either of their shipmates by some way and certainly well beyond the average life expectancy for the poor at the time, they were elderly. Matthew was a whip maker and could read and write, Jane could read, they were not convicted of violent crime and don't fit the 'pattern'. They left their only child, a daughter in England and after they were freed she joined them in Sydney.
Would Jane have been able to join Matthew after he had his TOL?  Is their any record that shows where they were assigned on arrival in Hobart? And, only conjecture, could she, in any way, have manipulated her transportation to join him?  A poor woman aged 51, with not much family to support her would face a fairly bleak future in 1840's Liverpool on her own, work house at best, perhaps risking transportation would seem preferable!

That's interesting and might very well solve it.  Would that mean the outlying areas too?  Something tells me I will never know!  But thank you for your help.  Do you know if there is a record of past Mayors of Mold anywhere?  This was my last hope,  I know when Fronhuelog was a school there was a Miss Evans, but that doesn't mean anything and I don't see how young lads with a motorbike would fit in!
The frustrating thing is when I was young and in Wales with my Dad, we popped in to see various  'Aunt somebody's' in cottages in the area, I just accepted it and never asked who they were!  Grrrrrrr. 
Thank you everyone!

Thank you for your replies, yes, the 1881 census with Thomas married to Maria is him, but the 1901 isn't, and the 1828 baptism is too early, sadly. He is pretty consistently 1831/1832.

I wondered if his mother could have been called Ann as his older sister was Ann, and Thomas and Maria's eldest daughter was Annie-Maria.  Names seem to be very repetitive in our family, but I haven't found anything.  As ever, I should have asked more questions when I was young
He did rather like to make more of himself than was the case!  So I take 'farmer' with a pinch of salt.

I meant to add I have a copy of an older family tree where his father is John and mother, Elinor with a ? Which is why I originally went down the Nantglyn route but nothing seems to tie up with this, including the names.

Loved all the stories re your various Grandparents, and there was I rather shamefaced about my double convict act and it seems they were almost models of virtue!  Thanks for the Founders website, that's fantastic, my ipad doesn't seem to want to view the original documents but I'll try on another device.  I find the appearances really interesting, Matthew's Grandson, my Grandfather could be look just like him except he was tall, well, minus the scars!