27
« on: Wednesday 29 May 19 12:32 BST (UK) »
We look to have the same wider family. This Jane looks to be the one born in 1862 with mmn being Wood. I think I've teased out before that the Goldenhill Jane, who married this Thomas Kent might have been a Wood. It all suggests that the age (7) of Elizabeth in the 1861Census was misrecorded, mistranscribed or whatever. It should have been 10 or 11.
We then have the 1851 June Qty Vol 17 p228 birth registration of Elizabeth Kent, mmn Wood.
Thomas Kent married Jane Wood at St Mark's Shelton in 1848 (just spotted it on staffordshirebmd.org.uk). Things are falling into place - unless someone comes up with contradictory information!
Many thanks for this lead.