Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - rlw254

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 18
19
'ignoto' unknown ; mother is Maria Leandri.

20
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: 1855 Prussian death record
« on: Tuesday 11 August 20 01:52 BST (UK)  »
Oops! I had re-cropped the image so the last bit wasn't cut off but posted the wrong one. Here's a close-up.

Thank you for the help.

21
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / 1855 Prussian death record
« on: Monday 10 August 20 07:21 BST (UK)  »
Hoping for some help reading the cause of death (left) and note of heirs (right) for this death recorded in 1855 for the sixth line down. It looks like 5 minors are left behind.

Thanks for any assistance.

22
There's a difference between using Y-DNA testing to find close paternal matches and using this type of test to determine a paternal surname. The former is much harder and, as people have said, can require a long-term investment and some luck. If, however, you just want to determine a paternal surname, a Y-DNA test can often uncover this at the cheapest level with moderate reliability. On FTDNA, I have 51 matches to my own Y-DNA at a low level (25 markers). Of these 51 matches, only 12 do not match my paternal surname. There is only one that is an actual close match with 67/67 markers shared. This becomes more complicated if the paternal surname is uncommon, with very few descendants having tested, but when the alternative is not knowing anything then it seems like an easy decision to me.

My husband’s surname is Wright. He has no y-DNA matches with that surname, and only 6 matches in total.  :-\

My father has hundreds of matches, most of them very low level matches - none have remotely similar surnames.

Hey, that's how it goes  :-X

Really it comes down to relying on a large network of people in a shared group to have tested. If the surnames in question come from a highly divergent group you might not see naming patterns. I stand by my original sentiment though where I would rather test and find out what the match pool looks like instead of not know at all.

23
The Lighter Side / Re: How far back have you got?
« on: Monday 15 June 20 06:09 BST (UK)  »
My farthest is a 1669 marriage in Sicily, but this line is unique because of the records available digitally. The rest of my tree hovers around people born in the mid-to-late 1700s. With half my tree being made of Irish famine immigrants to America, the possibility of getting back to a townland is quite daunting. Then once you can get there you have to deal with poor record availability  :(

24
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Help with theory
« on: Monday 15 June 20 05:43 BST (UK)  »
Do you mean that the man alleged to be her grandfather is actually her father? Would the birth mother be the wife of the "grandfather" or a woman from a younger generation? It could be possible to figure out but will require a lot of people testing and some luck. A little more information is needed for me to be clear.

Look at her alleged birth mother. Can you find other people who have had their DNA tested that match to any common ancestors in this line? Can you track down descendants of the alleged birth mother and persuade them to test? If you find matches to this maternal line, what about the alleged grandfather's wife's line? Negative results are not very informative but they can help.

It should also be possible to see the difference in numbers, but this will require some luck and a lot of descendant testing to be sure. Though until I can be clear on the scenario it is hard to say what to look for.

25
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Troublesome segment of DNA
« on: Tuesday 02 June 20 01:13 BST (UK)  »
I suspect the match for your father is under the threshold used to determine a 'match'. If you were to analyze the two kits on GEDmatch where you can lower this figure you might see some overlap. SNP density could likely allow you to be a match with this person and not him.

26
There's a difference between using Y-DNA testing to find close paternal matches and using this type of test to determine a paternal surname. The former is much harder and, as people have said, can require a long-term investment and some luck. If, however, you just want to determine a paternal surname, a Y-DNA test can often uncover this at the cheapest level with moderate reliability. On FTDNA, I have 51 matches to my own Y-DNA at a low level (25 markers). Of these 51 matches, only 12 do not match my paternal surname. There is only one that is an actual close match with 67/67 markers shared. This becomes more complicated if the paternal surname is uncommon, with very few descendants having tested, but when the alternative is not knowing anything then it seems like an easy decision to me.

27
That doesn't help you very much. At 116 cM I might expect that you share great-grandparents or great-great-grandparents with the person.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 18