RootsChat.Com

We now have a husband to Catherine, Patrick J. and a date of his death (22-7-59).  That is, if this is the proper tie-in and with little more than what has been stated we can assume, but still challenge.  At least it gives us some pause to assess just when Patrick and Kitty got married, but it opens up some avenues of research. While the address is different than that of the obituary of Catherine (Bath Street), it is in Irishtown.

Again, thank you scotmum!

jjc

Thank you Hallmark - Very interesting that you might have looked up these death notices.  But I do not see any Catherine's there, and one must keep in mind that she began as a McCarroll. And these Carroll's were located at that time that these death notices took place in and around County Tyrone.

I started a thread that covered two female members of the Carroll (McCarroll) family from County Tyrone.  It has become quite clear that the Ellen McCarroll's marriage to Andrew Bogan has clearly had its way on these boards. So it was time to split the beginning and create one for the Coady's.

Catherine McCarroll (known as Kitty) married a Coady and that group became very extensive.  The Coady's moved as far away from County Tyrone to Irishtown in Dublin, and even into France. But some stayed in in the Omagh area. Others traveled to Belfast.

At one time I had the good experience of visiting with some of the Coady family, and even had morning breakfast tea with Kitty in her home in Dublin. In fact I think we had a couple of times over tea - but that was a long time ago.

From this grocers in Dublin they spread far an wide and I lost track of many of them. Mary moved to France.  But the twins stayed in the Dublin area.  I think that there were 7 offspring and possibly two have survived and have made inroads to another generation.

The Coady's in Omagh survived the terrible slaughter on that fateful day and I wonder just how Charles made it. I hope that we can recall all of those days and join in assisting in bringing new light to the Coady name.

  Thank you for your fee information; I really appreciate it. 

To clarify some of the errors you seem to have dug up let me say that most of the things that I have stated up to now were taken from the Ulster Historical Foundation's report to me circa 1990, modified by what I could get from the general archives such as those of the 1901-1911 census contained in the National Archives.  While some of the data that has been used in the Ulster Foundation's report, it was very extensive and extremely expensive - but they also stated that there were many assumptions made that could (and couldn't) stand future research.

This does not excuse me for the errors are mine, as are the assumptions made. 

You do seem to have gone the hard way and come up with some of the things that were missing when I first gathered the data, and then further researched it and drew my own conclusions.  For example, The Mother Hary was actually Mary - however I was relying upon the national archives and not the Ulster Historical Foundation.  That data was from there and not the dissertation that I paid for.  If you can't rely upon the NationalArchives, they had to be free of charge.

You have two references to what appear to be "manifests" from the City of Rome and the Oceanic, but did not explain what the context was to conclude that Andrew and Ellen were associated with those boats (or ships).  These two points apparently conflict in that they were both 1899 but the ages differed for Andrew.

A point of interest however, because I need to look at it further but the reference to the Tyrone cousin Thom Carroll may be my Father's uncle that went to live in San Francisco.  The reference to a cousin throws it off, in that Andrew was born in Fermanagh and there would be a distance between the two (especially at that time).

Your reference to Nurse Clarke may be correct but the statement regarding that the informant was not Teresa Ross is wrong.  This was in response to a letter seeking more information from the Tyrone Constitution.  She and a P. J. McClean did respond; and, I did have the opportunity to talk to Mr. McClean of Beragh.  It may have been that Teresa quoted what Nurse Clarke may have said, but the quotation in my post had nothing to do with Nurse Clarke. 

My posting of the birth of John may have been cogent for the Ulster Historical report but when I made that reference, and the remarks, were based on the National Archives and it was an error that I did not pick up at this time.    It was my boo boo and not the gatherers of that report. 

There are always skeletons in our closets, some that we may find interesting except that they belong there.

Thank you, aghadowey