Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cogvos

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
19
Many thanks for such a quick reply. Though I was not asking for a birth certificate. I was however hoping that someone might be able to look up Sarah's birth in the parish register for Selworthy and then be able to confirm, or not, that her parents were John and Agnes Floyde.

I have the 1871 census for Selworthy (Village of Allerford) with Sarah aged 7 and listed as born in Selworthy (as she is on the 1881 census). I didn't bother to list this in my 1st message as it just confirms the 1881 census.

I have the Birth certificate for one of her son's where she is only listed as Sarah and while it is possible that she she has lost the Ann she has also lost the e from her surname (Floyd now not Floyde - again quite possible)

The clincher may be that there is a particular very unusual name that has passed down the female side of the family and it shows up in Sarah's offspring in Allerford and that I have a birthday book with a Sarah Floyd listed on July 15th 1863

Of course it is entirely possible that I am looking at the wrong Sarah here and that I need to be checking the Wootton Courtney one. Its just that the family home was Allerford for decades and Sarah raised her family there... or at lease we think she did!

So if Sarah was born to John and Mary on 15 July I'll need to rethink, if however she was born to John and Agnes (Agnes is also a name that got passed down the female line of my family) then I guess all well and good (?)

20
Dear all,

Can someone confirm a suspicion I have on the above. I believe that Sarah Floyd(e) was born around 1863/4 to John and Agnes Floyde (nee Floyde). I have a marriage certificate for them for May 2nd 1863 but at present have no connection. Given that Floyde is a very common name in that part of Somerset I could be completely wrong. According to free BMD there is a Sarah Floyde registered in Williiton in Sept 1863 which might be her. Alas I have not been able to get a birth cert from the GRO since the Family history centre closed, though at least I see the web site is now allowing you to again...

I have Sarah aged 17 living with John and Agnes in Selworthy on the 1881 census (RG11/2353) which is where the suspicion comes from.

If I am right then this ties up a loose end and a lot of head scratching (Floydes marring Floydes)

Here's hoping I am right!

John.


21
Suffolk / Re: Manning Bloss BORLEY - Father - Robert LIMOU - fact or fiction?
« on: Monday 08 June 09 23:10 BST (UK)  »
Alas I have no idea. Althea is a housekeeper at Tendring hall in Suffolk in 1851, according to the census, so I have no idea where she was at the time of Manning's birth. I am guessing that it was Essex, and probably in a village called Alresford (Sub district St Osyth - Tendring) as this is written on Manning's Birth certificate.

So what is on the birth cert as "place of birth" - just "Alresford", not more details? And who registered the birth, was it Althea herself?

Hi there.
From the top I have;

registration district - Tendring
1851 Birth in the sub district of Saint Osyth in the County of Essex

Columns            When and           Name if any          Sex          Name and surname of
   no                  Where born                                                                Father

 307                   Fifteenth July        Manning             Boy                 <blank>
                             1851                    Bloss
                           Alresford

Occupation of       Signature, description               When registered
father                    and residence of informant
   <blank>                        Althea Borley                  1st August  1851
                                        Mother
                                        Alresford

Then the registrars signature and a line through box 10.

So no fathers details, Althea as the informant and sadly just Alresford as the place.
 :-\

22
Suffolk / Re: Manning Bloss BORLEY - Father - Robert LIMOU - fact or fiction?
« on: Saturday 06 June 09 00:23 BST (UK)  »
What address was Manning born at in Tendring? I wonder if that gives any clues as to why he was born there.

Hello there.
Alas I have no idea. Althea is a housekeeper at Tendring hall in Suffolk in 1851, according to the census, so I have no idea where she was at the time of Manning's birth. I am guessing that it was Essex, and probably in a village called Alresford (Sub district St Osyth - Tendring) as this is written on Manning's Birth certificate. Sadly there is no record of Manning's baptism in Tendring. Was he baptised (if at all) elsewhere? Sadly I don't know.

Whether she was sacked, or more likely I feel, hidden for the last weeks of her pregnancy is sadly not certain either. Manning is adopted by 1861, but I do not know how long Althea cared for him after his birth. I believe that she is in Batalph(? writing on cenus is not clear), Colchester in 1861 (census RG 9 1097) while Manning is in Claydon quite a distance. As far as the written record goes she does not appear with Manning on anything other than his birth Cert. She does not whitness his wedding in 1873 in Claydon, she is in Brighton in 1881 but I do not have a census of her in 1871. Perhaps this would give a clue to if she kept in touch with her son?

At the time of the 1851 census Althea must have been pregnant, so possibly went to wherever she gave birth from Kenton Hall. Unless she went home first when pregnancy meant she was unable to work (or sacked) and then went to whatever the Essex address was.
If the Watkins were local to where her parents lived it seems more likely that they arranged the 'adoption' rather then Symonds. But if we can see who is at the address where Manning was born, in 1851 census just a few months earlier, I wonder if it will make things any clearer, or more than likely confuse us further!

I'm not sure when the census was taken, Manning was born on the 15th July 1851. Althea was born in Barham, Suffolk on 3rd Feb 1820 and baptised there on the 18th June (both are recorded on the parish register). The Watkins Family lived in Claydon, Suffolk (they are there in 1851) so again there is no Essex connection as far as I can tell. According to google Kenton hall is 14 miles from Claydon and almost 40 from Alresford, Essex. So again I cannot figure why Manning was born so far from his adopted family. Its a real puzzle.

So far I have failed to find any Bastardy records citing Althea, Manning or Robert Symonds so alas I am presently stuck  :-\

23
Suffolk / Re: Manning Bloss BORLEY - Father - Robert LIMOU - fact or fiction?
« on: Saturday 30 May 09 19:08 BST (UK)  »
Hi there,

To be honest I have no idea where Manning Bloss Borley obtained his first names. There are Bloss families around as well. Could it be that Althea was just not sure who the father was? Or did these families help her in her time of need? Maybe she just liked the name. I haven't managed to find an uncle or someone who might have had one or other name yet. They could be out there? Equally I have no idea why Manning is registered in Essex. As far as I can tell he came straight back to Suffolk after his birth. Or maybe not. There is a gap of 9-10 years until the1861 cenus. I have no idea where he was between his birth and then.

Kenton hall, where Althea was working in 1851,  is actually mentioned a couple of times on the net - http://www.bigenealogy.com/suffolk/kenton_parish.htm but sadly this does not go into detail about the 1700's so at present I don't have much clue, and I guess without a Rosseta stone style will probably never will  :-\

Still if you find any of your Mannings tying in with the Borley's, or perhaps Garnhams (Althea's mother was Amy Garnham  - born between 1792 - 1797 according to the IGI) I'd be very interested to hear!

John.

24
Suffolk / Re: Manning Bloss BORLEY - Father - Robert LIMOU - fact or fiction?
« on: Friday 29 May 09 22:16 BST (UK)  »
Dear all,

I am restarting this as I finally got myself to the Essex Reg office and looked through Tendring's parish records. I also checked the Bastardy records for Tendring and  the poor house records. Result? Zilch. Manning Bloss Borley may well have been registered in Essex but as far as I can tell he was not baptised there, if he was Baptised at all. Equally he doesn't show on any official documents that I can find until the 1861 census when he is listed as Manning Watkins, living in Claydon, Suffolk,  the adopted son of William and Mary Watkins.

Sadly I still have no connection between the Borley's and Watkins, other than they were geographically close to each other in Suffolk and the Watkins' were very nice people, apparently fostering/looking after a number of children though-out their lives. Though Manning is the only one listed as adopted.

I think I have found Althea Borley's grandparents on the paternal side but would welcome comments on this;

Althea's father was George Borley. He was baptised in Liittle Blakenham (the IGI lists Greater Blakenham and the wrong spouse) In September 1780 - though I have just realised I did not make note of the full date! His parents are most likely to be Charles and Hanna, but I cannot find a corresponding marriage for them, there is one for 1735 which might be great grandparents? But it is almost illegable. He appears to have had 4 siblings;

Edward - 20 Feb 1775
Thomas - 29 May 1777
Joseph - 6 Dec 1778
Thomas - 16 Feb 1783 - I am assuming that the Thomas of 1777 died as an infant.

Sadly having spent a long time trying, and failing, to tie down Manning's Essex connection, I was not able to progress much further in Ipswich. Still does the above correspond with anyone elses research?

John.

25
England / Re: Struggling to pin down Ada Knight
« on: Wednesday 27 May 09 22:32 BST (UK)  »
Dear all,

In a word... WoW! Thank you for such quick and helpful replies!

From the top.

JenB - I goofed! and read the wrong column in my first post. Ada is listed as 18 on RG 13/3000 - full census info is Admin county Leicestershire, Civil Parish Leicester (formally Belgrave part of)  Ecclesiastical Parish - looks like New Huinba<squiggle> of St Barnabas. The '9' I quoted is actually in the 'Condition as to marriage' column (whatever that means?) - really sorry and I hope that this does not mean that I have sent everyone on a wild goose chase...  ???

Tati - no I confess that I have not checked 1911, as this was not available when I was last searching, but it's a good idea and thank you all for doing so.

Re the children. The only one I know for certain is Henry George Wooster, born 30 May 1903, though I don't know where, and who married in 1932. It is probable that there were others.

I cannot work out how the Belgrave family gets from Leicester if this is the correct one in 1901. if RG12 is the 1891 Census then I have them there as well... Listed as.

1901 - RG 13 3000
George Knight - age 42
Catherine Knight - age 42 (wife)
Ada Knight - age 18 (daughter)
John Knight - age 15 (son)
Fredrick Knight - age 7 (son)

1891? - RG 12/2522
George Knight - age 32
Catherine Knight - age 32
Ada knight - age 8
John Knight - age 5

I think since they have to get from Leicester to London and loose George by 1902 I can thus discount the Leicester option? Could someone see if there is a Knight family in Leicester in 1911? If they are then it is not my lot.

Alas I have no middle name for Ada, its not mentioned on the marriage cert.

In the RG12/1 - Paddington census I have

George - a widower aged 37
A 15 year old son, who's name I cannot make out
Fredrick aged 10
Ada aged 7

and
John Knight  aged 74, wonder if this is George's dad? He is a carpenter and George Wooster's occupation is listed as Wood Sawyer on his Marriage to Ada.

Oddly it looks like 13 people are living at no 69 Hampton Street, the first name being James A Beale a paper hanger and decorator and the last Charlotte Beale a widower Both born is Sussex.

I wonder if this is actually some kind of workshop with families living above, or maybe a large builders yard?

Also could it be that Ada met George due to George being apprenticed to John Knight, is there a George Wooster living nearby in 1901? She does not have an occupation listed on her marriage cert ( not sure if that is normal or not for the 1900's) and I couldn't finder her in 1901 when I searched a few years ago, other than in Leicestershire...

Many thanks for all you help!

John.

26
England / Struggling to pin down Ada Knight
« on: Wednesday 27 May 09 20:03 BST (UK)  »
Dear all,

I have recently restarted my family hunt, I gave up completely stumped at every point having managed to get some branches back to the early 1800's and some really no-where. This is one of my no-wheres and it would be nice if I can find out a bit more about this lady.

Her name is Ada Knight, sadly a very common name, On 29th December 1902, aged 21 years, she married George Henry Wooster at the Baptist church in Palmerston road Wealdstone, NW london. Her father was George Knight who died some time before 1902 and was a paper hanger. So Ada was born around 1881 and that is as far as I got.

The problem is that the census for 1891, when Ada would have been around 10/11 throws up the following;

Leicestershire - RG 13/3000
George Knight (head) - House decorator (crossed out word paint written above)
Ada - aged 9 a scholar

and

Belgrave (district Melton) - RG12 2522
George Knight (head) - House decorator
Ada aged 8 a scholar

and !

Paddington - RG12/1
George Knight (head) - Paper hanger & Decorator
Ada aged 7 a scholar.

Now, clot that I am, I did not write the census dates on the printouts I have so can someone first tell me if these are from 1891? I cannot remember.

Secondly could someone suggest a way of untangling these families so that I can find the correct Ada?

Indeed can someone suggest a way to generally untangle problems such as this as I have several similar stumbling blocks.

John.

27
Buckinghamshire / Re: Joseph WOOSTER (WORSTER/WORCESTER/WODSTER) bc 1813 Bucks
« on: Sunday 28 October 07 12:50 GMT (UK)  »
Hi,

The info I have on Joseph's occupation comes from the 1851 census for Bushey. The family were in Clay hill in 1851 and Merry hill lane in 1861 however they initially settled in Great Stanmore, the first of their 13 children was born there in 1838.

Your recollection on the marriage is correct. The IGI lists Joseph Worster marrying Rebecca Kite in Paddington. Sadly having obtained a copy of the register the entry really does look like Kite and not Hite and since the marriage was on 23 Oct 1835 the civil registration will not help.

The Elenor/Selena mystery still has me confused, though someone suggested the pronunciation of Selena can be Selenor which brings it closer, particularly if she had an unfamiliar (to the registrar) accent.

It is interesting that your correspondent mentioned that Joseph headed London-wards whilst his brother stayed in Bucks. There are Worster/Woosters listed on the land registry records in Marylebone St, Paddington at the correct time, but sadly there is no Christian name until after the marriage of Joseph and Rebecca, when an Elizabeth Wooster is living there (1835 & 1837). I have no idea how she fits into this, or even if she does, however one of Joseph and Rebecca's children was Elizabeth, bn 9 Dec 1860.

I have a copy of the will of Timothy Wooster which mentions a William Wooster, Francis Wooster, Ann Allen nee Wooster, William fleet, Thomas Wooster, Job Wooster and Joseph Wooster but no George or Selina (!) The last is really odd as Selena is listed as Buried in Wendover church in 1859 aged 82 and Timothy dies in 1833. I think the marriage of Joseph and Rebecca has an Allen as one of the witnesses, but at present cannot find the register entry I copied, and there were Allens living in Paddington at the time of their marriage.

Anyway that's pretty much as far as I have got.

J.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6