Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chirp

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 51
19
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Looking for my half-brother
« on: Saturday 10 March 18 23:17 GMT (UK)  »
A few ideas that come to mind are: contacting the adoption agency (if one was used), message in a local newspaper, Facebook or other social media, electors list (if it is possible to have access), school/college records. Of course no organisation is likely to give you an address but maybe they would pass on a letter from you. I am assuming that both parents are not alive or do not wish (or are unable) to help? Good luck.

20
The Common Room / Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« on: Tuesday 06 March 18 17:15 GMT (UK)  »
Thank you Sloe Gin. I too have a couple of these short certificates and they were issued some years after the child's birth so I wondered if they had been obtained when the individual was starting work.

21
The Common Room / Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« on: Monday 05 March 18 16:46 GMT (UK)  »
Apologies if this appears twice, I sent my message but it seems to have disappeared.

I have a baptism entry where the clerk has recorded the father's occupation in French which was useful as I suspected the family was from France. This is not proof I know but interesting. Sometimes there are additional comments such as information stating from where an incomer originated. Another particularly useful one for me was the note that the burial of a young man, whose name was the same as his cousin, was the "son of the shoemaker".

22
The Common Room / Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« on: Monday 05 March 18 09:54 GMT (UK)  »
Yay indeed for the census collectors that didn't follow instructions! Also for those parish clerks who added their own little comments.

23
The Common Room / Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« on: Sunday 04 March 18 22:45 GMT (UK)  »
To answer Paulo Leeds question about what happened to the birth certificates - I have no idea. I have often wondered if people did not routinely have copies of birth certificates for their children. Maybe they had to pay and the cost was too high? I have several replacement ones which were issued when the child became old enough to go to work or joined the army. I guess such things were not a priority in those times unless needed by "the authorities".

24
Lancashire / Re: Manchester Nightclub 1960s
« on: Sunday 04 March 18 22:38 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks Walter - where would we be without Google eh? It is fascinating to see pictures of these places we knew in our youth and so interesting to read other people's comments.

25
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Cause of death
« on: Sunday 04 March 18 09:48 GMT (UK)  »
I would agree that it is Hernia. I think the style of writing (rather elongated) is what's causing the confusion. I have an ancestor who died in the 1870s of Strangulated Hernia but this is 1840s - maybe they were less precise with their medical terms at that time.

26
The Common Room / Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« on: Saturday 03 March 18 13:08 GMT (UK)  »
Even as late as the early 20th century not everyone was certain of their date of birth. I have instances in my grandmother's family where an older sibling was asked to confirm the date of a younger one's birth and my grandmother herself once told me she had for some years celebrated her birthday on what turned out to be the wrong date.

27
Cheshire / Re: Burial St Peters Congleton
« on: Tuesday 20 February 18 11:30 GMT (UK)  »
This link might be helpful
https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Congleton_St_Peter,_Cheshire_Genealogy

Looks like you will need to contact Cheshire Records Office



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 51