Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BashLad

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 39
19
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: DNA testing accuracy
« on: Thursday 16 January 20 21:44 GMT (UK)  »
People think autosomal DNA tests say where you're ancestors lived - they're actually telling you where people related to you now live. They inevitably depend on the size of the population sampled and the specificity of the test. Which company/test to choose depends on what you know of your own ancestry and what you're looking for. Personally as a Brit I would recommend LivingDNA because they got almost exactly what I expected. I have 8/128 GGGGG-grandparents (6.25%) from Cornwall -

20
Quote
https://trc-leiden.nl/trc-digital-exhibition/index.php/silk-embroidered-postcards
Much appreciated. Can't fault the efficiency of this site.

Quote
You are probably aware that as a chemist in the RE he was almost certainly a member of one of the Special Companies - our gas troops.
Yes, he was a chemist corporal, sadly of all the family who served his are the records that got destroyed. Fortunately the local paper ran an article on him after the war which outlined some of his service.

21
I've taken these embroidered post cards out of an old photo album I'm dismantling, scanning and intend to reorganise into a new album. My g-grandfather was a chemist in the royal engineers and I know he was gassed at the somme (perhaps at albert). Are these things mementoes of post-war visits perhaps? I know this gents sister-in-law visited the cemeteries some time c1920 after the war as there's photos of her there.

22
The Common Room / Re: How useful are Rate Books?
« on: Tuesday 03 December 19 20:03 GMT (UK)  »
Has anyone actually found an ancestor using rate books?

I understand they are useful if you already know a location of an ancestor and can use them to check how long someone lived at a particular address....but using them as an alternative to missing census records has never worked for me.

There is no biographical information, so if you have an ancestor with a common name living in a city it's impossible to know for certain if you've identified the correct ancestor.

If they live alone you can't connect them to other family members and identify them that way.

London electoral records are available to view on FMY past and Ancestry but for the people I can't locate (two brick wall ancestors that I've spent countless hours on with incredible help from rootschatters) electoral registers are not a useful substitute.

Am I missing something obvious? Something in the data sets that I've not understood?
I've been able to use them to identify where people lived in between census years, and because my great-grandparents sold their house to my grandparents clarify when that happened.

But as you say they're of little/no use finding new ancestors or if the surname was Smith.

23
The Common Room / Re: The Family in History
« on: Wednesday 27 November 19 20:41 GMT (UK)  »
What a very unchristian , judgemental remark for a chaplain to make.
It was also a rare, but real, phenomenon albeit subject to a daily-mail-esque moral panic.

https://www.thesocialhistorian.com/fraud-murder-burial-club/

But to the topic at hand I always try and link the local and social history to my genealogy. For instance some of mine moved from Buckinghamshire to Lancashire in the window 1832 -1839 and when I looked at the local history it turned out that poor law commissioners sponsored poor ag labs  to relocate by canal 1835-1837 - probably not a coincidence.

That said it pays to check your assumptions as another family relocated from the countryside to the towns and I assumed they were following the work but I later found a distant relation with the same surname (they were the only family in the area with the name) was involved in a fairly nasty attempted murder and then within 15 months everyone with the name had either moved to Bradford or towards Manchester.

But for me it's always a victory to link the family tree to specific historical events. For example the Loveclough printworks burnt down and both a granddad's maternal aunt and a paternal aunt relocated their respective families 35 miles to the same village.

I've also found more than a few emigrants whose departure turned out to coincide with goldrushes.   

24
The Common Room / Re: LIVING people on FamilySearch. I am ropable.
« on: Wednesday 27 November 19 20:01 GMT (UK)  »
It's funny really because genealogical websites can only exist in the EU because data protection law doesn't apply to the dead.

When they hold inaccurate details on the living they're putting themselves at risk of some hefty fines if someone puts in a complaint against them - frankly I'm surprised they don't automatically screen out anything born or died within the last century.

25
Lancashire / Re: DIY SOS from Blackburn
« on: Wednesday 20 November 19 21:09 GMT (UK)  »
Most generations had a Jane Ellen so I assumed Janey was the Jane Ellen of hers.

It was only when I started gathering the BMDs that I realised she was Janey all along, she was even baptised that way.

26
Lancashire / Re: DIY SOS from Blackburn
« on: Wednesday 20 November 19 19:25 GMT (UK)  »
The women too ,and girls often known by both Christian names.
My M in L was Mary Elizabeth ,fondly known as “ our MarLiz” her mother Sarah Anne was “ Seranne”.
Is that known elsewhere?
Viktoria.
I don't know about elsewhere but I'd say that was a thing in Rossendale. G-grandma Edith Ann was always Eadie-Annie all the boys in that generation had one name and all the girls had two apart from Janey - who was Janey - and that's not short for something else.

27
Lancashire / Re: DIY SOS from Blackburn
« on: Saturday 16 November 19 17:44 GMT (UK)  »
I love the name Oswaldtwistle - once heard it was pronounced Ozzletwissle but don't know if that's right.

I have visited Oswaldtwistle Mill a couple of times in the past
Ozzy is definitely Oz-ul-twissle.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 39