Hello Michael!
thank you for your very informative reply. I really do appreciate your research on my behalf, sorry it was not more fruitful for you!! I have been fretting over these HANLON ancestors for a few weeks now, with no success. So I thought I would try a request on here.
Albert Ashley HANLON is shown as aged 24, a bachelor, at his wedding on 4th May 1903. Sarah Ann REYNOLDS was aged 23 and a spinster - her father was Thomas REYNOLDS, a farmer.
I have the details on Sarah Ann REYNOLDS prior to 1901. She is the daughter of Thomas and Mary REYNOLDS of Bishop's Castle, Shropshire. Thomas and Sarah can be seen in the 1891 census at Bishop's Castle. In the 1881 census on the LDS website, Thomas's name is incorrectly transcribed as James REYNOLDS.
It's the 1901 census where I can't find Sarah. I feel that she may then either have been in Liverpool (where an older, married brother lived) or in Newcastle (where her sister-in-law's family came from).
I have seen the Albert HANLON in Montgomeryshire in 1901. Interestingly, he is married to a girl who was formerly an ASHLEY, and is staying at his in-law's farm. The ASHLEY connection is eerie?? I am beginning to wonder if there is a connection here somehow.
Can we trust any of the details on the wedding certificate for Albert Ashley HANLON? The only consistency I have found for him so far is that he is shown as Albert HANLON, photographer, on the birth certificate of my grandmother born in 1904 at Berrington, Shropshire. Sarah was at this time shown as being resident in the workhouse there.
Anyway, these are my latest thoughts. If you do find anything on the HANLON line I would indeed be most grateful, even if it only eliminates SOME possibilities!!
Best Wishes,
Garry Brookes