Albert Newell 1901

[bobtonks]

In 1901 Albert Newell lived in Tadlow Cambridgeshire.

Can anyone see him and his family in the 1901 census?

[bekahsgran]

Hi
1901 census
Tadlow Entire, Cambs
NEWELL
Mary Head Wid 54 b Guilden Morden, Cambs
Arthur Son Unm 22/7 Horsekeeper on farm b Tadlow
Albert Son Unm 17 Stockman on farm b Tadlow
Earnest Son 15 Ord Ag Lab b Tadlow
Anne

[bobtonks]

Anne
Thanks for the info. Can anyone see where they were living in 1891?

Bob

[bekahsgran]

Hi Bob
1891 census
RG12 Piece 1277 Folio 33 Page 3
Mill Farm, Tadlow, Cambs
Mary Newell Head Wid 44 Poultry Manager b Guilden Morden
Wifred J Son 15 Ag Lab b Tadlow
Arthur Son 12 Ag Lab b Tadlow
John Son 10 Ag Lab b Tadlow
Albert E Son 7 Scholar b Tadlow
Earnest W Son 5 Scholar b Tadlow
Frank BROCKETT Nephew Unm 22 Ag Lab b Guilden Morden
Anne

[bobtonks]

Anne

Thanks, I have now found Mary Newell and her husband William in the 1881 census, still in Tadlow. William died 1890, Freebmd. I also found William Newell married Mary Brocket in 1867. Can you see them in 1871?

Bob

[bekahsgran]

Hi Bob
I have found them on the 1871 but I think the enumerator got a bit muddled with the relationships, so I will put down firstly what the actual image says and then tell you what I think the rea#lationships should be, okay?
1871 census
RG10 Piece 1577 Folio 82 Page 6
Tadlow, Cambs
NEWELL
John Head Marr 73 Pauper b Wrestlingworth, Beds
Sarah Wife  Marr 75 Pauper b St Neots, Hunts
William Grandson Marr 27 Labourer b Tadlow
Mary Daur in Law Marr 24 Labs Wife b Morden, Cambs
Fanny Grandaur Unm 22 Labs Daur b Wrestlingworth, Beds

So I think all the relationships are correct except MARY who should be listed as Grandaur in Law as she seems to be Williams Wife. Is that right?
I'll see if I can find William on the 1861 if you like
BRB
Anne

[bobtonks]

Anne

I agree about Mary. It would be good to see the 1861 census

Bob

[bekahsgran]

Hi Bob
Found them on the 1861 and 1851 and seems I was wrong, the 1871 should read WILLIAM NEWELL 'SON' 27
I thought the grandson was correct because of Sarah's age, but the 1851 and 1861 confirm that William is the son of JOHN and SARAH
1861 Census
RG9 Piece 1017 Folio 98 Page 8
Harks/Hooks Mill Farm, Tadlow (transcribed as NESSEL, but original definitely says NEWEL
John Head Marr 62 Ag Lab b Wrestlingworth
Sarah Wife Marr 64 b St Neots, Beds
WILLIAM Son Unm 17 Ag Lab b Tadlow
Fanny Daur 12 Scholar b Wrestlingworth
Elizabeth COLE Visitor 4 b Wrestlingworth


1851 Census
HO107 Piece 1758 Folio 295 Page 9
Hooks Mill Farm, Tadlow
NEWEL
John Head Marr 57 Ag Lab b Wrestlingworth, Beds
Sarah Wife 53 b St Neots
John Son Unm 18 Ag Lab b Tadlow
Caroline Daur 16 b Tadlow
William Son 7 b Tadlow
Fanny Daur 2 b Tadlow
Anne

[bobtonks]

Anne

Many thanks. Lots to keep me busy for the next few days

Bob