Hi everyone,
Since I was on the spot during the GR mutiny so to speak, I just wanted to have my say.
Firstly I have to say that the more genealogy sites on the net there are, the better, as it means more chance of finding an obscure rellie
I think each site has its own particular flavour and its own strong points .
For instance I spend much time here on wonderful Rootschat and have found out loads. from knowledgeable and helpful folk.
Meanwhile I looked in quite a lot on GR and got some good contacts about my family tree which have also been invaluable.
I have gained from their message boards too -- there were a core of regulars who knew their subject inside out and could come back with a point of information at the drop of the hat. They did this in a rather more informal atmosphere than prevails here, it is true, and there was a great deal of cheerful mayhem going on.
The trouble started when a certain element began to take exception to this, going as far as setting up websites specifically to name and humiliate the people they objected to. They also posted malicious messages, and reported anyone who took exception to their rancour to the GR management, getting many of the people who contributed most to the site banned.
It was because these people were banned
without chance of appeal, while the troublemakers remained, that the mutiny started. Polite emails did no good. Phone calls did no good. The attitude was that the matter would not be discussed. Thus the members in question, and their friends, saw their run of postings as the only way to get the management to listen to them.
Finally, over five hundred of their members voted with their feet.
This sort of thing could never happen here, because the people who run it do so for the sake of their members. They are accessible and fair. No one feels they have been unfairly treated or regarded as a cash cow.
I just wanted to try to set the record straight, especially in view of that top of the board message from the GR management which didn't give a full picture of the situation and was therefore somewhat misleading
Hope you will all read this in the spirit it was written, respectful and conciliatory