Annesley & the KNIGHT family

[MOM OF TWO]

Interested in the knight family who were residing in Annesley area in the years 1855 - 1900 onwards.

George Knight ( born 1855) Annesley Woodhouse married to Eleanor Knight born 1848 at Lowick Northhamptonshire. Son Arthur born in 1888 at Annesley. Family residing at ? Masters Row Annesley in 1901

Parents of George were George & Mary knight.

Any information or links will be welcome. having difficulty tracing family on census

Teresa

[heywood]

I wonder if this is him:
1871  RG10; Piece: 3476; Folio: 120; Page: 7

no address Annesley
George Knight 58 yrs  ag labourer b Eaton
Mary Knight 46 yrs b Worksop
George 17 yrs  coal miner b Kirkby (possibly- can't read it)
Sarah A 14 yrs b Kirkby
regards
heywood

hop this is the kind of info you wanted

[MOM OF TWO]

Yes this seems to be the same family but still having difficulty in tracing them after 1871.

I can find George (junior) in  the 1901 census married to Eleanor with son Arthur still living at Annesley.
 thank you
Teresa

[heywood]

there are some possibilities for dad going off age and Eaton as birthplace:

1851 HO107; Piece: 2122; Folio: 308; Page: 24

Hodsock
George Knight 37 yrs gamekeeper b Eaton
Sarah Knight 36 yrs b Gringley

1861- none
1871 as above
1891 RG12; Piece: 2658; Folio 22; Page 38
Annesley Park (can't decipher rest)
George Knight 78 yrs gardener domestic b Eaton
Elizabeth 77 yrs b Watnall (?)
1881 George and Elizabeth are in Annesley- they are indexed as Kedglet!
It looks like him - being married 3 times though.

[heywood]

I think this will be them in 1891 - indexed as Kinght!

Class: RG12; Piece: 2661; Folio 88; Page 9

Forest Road Kirkby in Ashfield

George Knight 36 yrs  coal miner b Annesley Wood
Ellen  48 yrs  Lowick
William 14 yrs  ANnesley
Hannah 12 yrs  Annesley
Arthur 10  yrs Annesley

best wishes

[MOM OF TWO]

Thank you Heywood I am so pleased that this may be Arthur's family in 1891.

Interesing regarding George (senior) ? three marriages and being a gamekeeper. Lots of leads to follow.
Thank you everyone.

[Dizzifish]

Hello Teresa 

This marriage and baptism's may help a little bit in sorting out your Knight family.

Possible Marriage;
George Knight & Sarah Jane Stewart at Annesley 24th November 1873

Annesley Baptism's - fathers name George KNIGHT abode Annesley, profession Collier

Mary Ann, mother Sarah Jane                       baptised 20th Feb 1874
Eliza Ann, mother Sarah Jane,                      baptised 18th July 1875
William, mother Sarah, born 24th Jan 1877 -baptised 17th Nov 1880     
Hannah.mother Sarah, born 23rd Nov 1878 - baptised17th Nov 1880   
Arthur, mother Sarah, born 17th July 1880  -baptised  17th Nov 1880     
George, mother Sarah Jane,                          baptised 29th Oct 1882

Best Wishes Sheila.

[heywood]

This implies so much more! I had wondered last night if Eleanor/ Ellen would have been married before because of her alleged age but this indicates that George was.
I did intend to look more last evening but it got too late. Arthur's age is out too from what you originally wrote - 10 yrs in 1891, I had presumed that that was just an error in transcript.
There is one death for a Sarah Jane Knight in 3rd quarter 1882- before George's baptism. Her year of birth was 1854.
There is also a George's death in 1882- year of birth 1882.
Also a couple of possible marriages with Ellens - one being later in 1882 but you perhaps need a bit more evidence.
well you have a lot more to search.
best wishes
heywood

[Dizzifish]

Hello....

Heywood hope you are still on?
Re the info I posted earlier....would you do me a favour and check this out please, to make sure I am not going mad!

The last baptism had the address of 157 Annesley which I had forgotten to add 

But check this on the 1881 RG11/3320/30  and bearing in mind the marriage details for George and Sarah Jane......what do you make of it?.....Sykes?  puzzled now.

Sheila


ps
I did check the 1881 on FamilySearch and Ancestry and both indexed as Sykes and have to admit that it seems to say Sykes, but together with childrens names and the address plus the fact the brother in law is called Stewart has me puzzled.