1891 census - Jeffrey family

[saar3]

Could anyone please check the 1891 census entry for this family:

1881 census entry
Dwelling:   Royal Hotel 15 Oakworth Rd
   Census Place:   Keighley, York, England
   Source:   FHL Film 1342038     PRO Ref RG11    Piece 4348    Folio 50    Page 33
   Marr   Age   Sex   Birthplace
Charles JEFFREY   M   24    M   Calverley, York, England
   Rel:   Head
   Occ:   Waiter (Inn)
Louisa JEFFREY   M   24    F   Bramley, York, England
   Rel:   Wife
Willey JEFFREY   U   6 m   M   Keighley, York, England
   Rel:   Son

By 1891 they were probably living in Queensbury. I think Louisa died in 1891. There were probably several more children including Gaunt Jeffrey aged about 2.

[M.T.H]

Hi Saar3,

This might be the family that you're looking for on the 1891 census

Ref:RG12/3646  Folio 91  Page 7

Admin county:Yorkshire (West riding)

Civil Parish:Clayton

Town or Village:Queensbury

Ecclesiastical District:Holy Trinity

15 Campbell Street
Shedule No.44

Charles Jeffrey,Head,Widr,34,Joiner,b.Calverley Yorkshire
Sarah Jeffrey,Sister,Unm,19,Housekeeper,b.Calverley
Willie Jeffrey,Son,10,Worsted Spinner,b.Keighley
Emily Jeffrey,Daur,6,b.Shipley
Gaunt,Son,2,b.Clayton

Hope this helps,Mick

[DebPat]

This Looks like them!

 Jeffrey, Charles 34 Calverley, Yorkshire Head  Clayton  Yorkshire   
 Jeffrey, Emily 6 Shipley, Yorkshire Daughter  Clayton  Yorkshire   
 Jeffrey, Gaunt 2 Clayton, Yorkshire Son  Clayton  Yorkshire   
 Jeffrey, Sarah 19 Clayverley, Yorkshire Sister  Clayton  Yorkshire   
 Jeffrey, Willie 10 Heighley, Yorkshire Son  Clayton  Yorkshire   

RG12/3646
Registration district:    Bradford 
Sub registration district:    Thornton 
ED, institution, or vessel:    27 
Folio:    91 
Page:    7 

[saar3]

Very many thanks for that help. Sister Sarah was new to me. And 3 of the children who appear in 1901 are missing.
Any sign of Edith Jeffrey ( born Keighley, Clara Jeffrey (4) born Queensbury and Ernest Jeffrey (infant) born Queensbury.

Any help appreciated.

[M.T.H]

Hi,

They won't be on the 1891 if  those ages are right for the 1901,

Just a thought,Mick

[saar3]

They're the ages in 1891!!

Edith was 18 ..................