Author Topic: married in church but no certficate  (Read 3529 times)

Offline ccr

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
    • View Profile
married in church but no certficate
« on: Sunday 14 January 07 17:14 GMT (UK) »
I have found my gt gt grandparents marriage in the records of St David's RC marriages but cannot find any trace in the free BMD site. is this usual. Surname Brien but children vary  : Brien/Brian/Bryan/O'brien
Know it is same because mother's maiden name same also address. Any advice anyone?

CCR

Offline julianb

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,523
  • Portrait of the genealogist as a young man
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 14 January 07 17:19 GMT (UK) »
Free BMD is not yet complete - so it is possible that the names haven't been transcribed yet.

This is the link for the charts showing proportion of marriage records transcribed:

http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/progressM.shtml

JULIAN
ESSEX  Carter, Enever, Jeffrey, Mason, Middleditch, Pond, Poole, Rose, Sorrell, Staines, Stephens, Surry, Theobald HUNTS  Danns KENT  Luetchford, Wood NOTTINGHAMSHIRE  Baker, Dunks, Kemp, Price, Priestley, Swain, Woodward SUFFOLK  Rose SURREY  Bedel, Bransden, Bysh, Coleman, Gibbs, Quinton SUSSEX Gibbs, Langridge, Pilbeam, Spencer WILTSHIRE  Brice, Rumble

Offline Tati

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,847
  • Ephraim's daughter to infinity & beyond
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 14 January 07 17:22 GMT (UK) »
What were their names and when did they marry?  :)
 "My dear, I think the English pronounce it 'appiness"  

I'm afraid of no ghost

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ccr

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #3 on: Monday 15 January 07 00:57 GMT (UK) »
Patrick Brien and Margaret Hayes April 25 1854 Cardiff St Davids RC .


Offline colinjohn

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #4 on: Monday 15 January 07 09:34 GMT (UK) »
Was the church licensed for marriages at that time? RC churches had to pay to be licensed and so not all were, particularly in the early years - CoE churches were automatically licensed. The ceremony might well have taken place at a different time in the Register office, possibly even in a different Registration district.

Colin
I am sorry but my emails are no longer working

Offline hartryyrtrah

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #5 on: Monday 15 January 07 09:55 GMT (UK) »
I agree with Colin in most respects.

I would add that there have been mistakes, in recent years, over the registration of churches and their clergy.  Some of these have had to be cleared up in Westminster.  If as seems likely there we're mistakes in the 1850s, it is totally possible that the marriage was not legally registered. 

When these problems have been cleared up I don't know what the registered date would be.

Paul
Hartry - Street/Bruton, Newton & Colwell - Exmoor
Norrington, Johnson & Radcliff - Kent
Hassell - London, Atkinson, Byrne - East End
Campion - London & Ireland, Bird, Byford - Suffolk

Offline olinda

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 01 February 07 22:47 GMT (UK) »
I was thrown for a long time by the wedding of David Phillips and Margaret Bevan in September 1885. There is no reference to this wedding in the BMD records but I have a certificate showing the wedding took place at St John's Church, Waterloo Road, Surrey. Was this church certificate adequate or should the marriage have been registered separately?. David died not long after the wedding so there was a good reason why he might not have registered correctly.
Urquhart (Orkney, Shetland, Liverpool, Cardiff)
Nippers (Wlltshire,Bristol,Glamorgan)
Catford (Bristol, Cardiff)
Sims (Worcester, Glamorgan)
Rose (Devon Cardiff)
Westlake (Devon, Cardiff)

Offline colinjohn

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #7 on: Friday 02 February 07 09:06 GMT (UK) »
The church certificate is not sufficient, the marriage should have been recorded with the GRO too.

Was the church non-conformist? It might be that it was not licensed for marriages. If it is CoE then it should automatically have been registered at the time of the ceremony. It might be just that this was one of those that have slipped through the net, see http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/mikefost/

What BMD records have you checked? - if you are referring to FreeBMD remember that it is not yet complete.

Colin
I am sorry but my emails are no longer working

Offline olinda

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
    • View Profile
Re: married in church but no certficate
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 03 February 07 23:33 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Colinjohn. I have searched the GRO records at the Family History Centre and found no sign of this wedding. I don't know the type of church - the certificate refers to The Parish Church of St John, Waterloo Road, Surrey and indicates that the wedding was in accordance with the rites and ceremonies of the Established Church.
I suspect that this registration just slipped through the net.
Urquhart (Orkney, Shetland, Liverpool, Cardiff)
Nippers (Wlltshire,Bristol,Glamorgan)
Catford (Bristol, Cardiff)
Sims (Worcester, Glamorgan)
Rose (Devon Cardiff)
Westlake (Devon, Cardiff)