Author Topic: re George & Mary Ann Cleveley  (Read 992 times)

Offline nana1944

  • I am sorry but my emails are not working
  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
re George & Mary Ann Cleveley
« on: Sunday 14 January 07 17:27 GMT (UK) »
Last week SKS looked up a family with the above name for 1881 & 1901 census years.
Subsequently I was given the census 1871, 1861 for them and in looking more closely this is the wrong family, perhaps, cousins.

Our family George dob 1853, Mary A dob1852, George, son 1874, William, son 1876, Lucy 1878, Eliza (Elizabeth)1879,
Emily 1881, John Edward, 1883,  Albert(Alfred)1885,Herbert,1887.

I would sincerely appreciate another lookup.  Thank you.
 

Cleveley, Bowers, Fulton
Ollerton, Rusholme, Stockport,
Worcester

Online PaulineJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,314
    • View Profile
Re: re George & Mary Ann Cleveley
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 14 January 07 17:54 GMT (UK) »

Here is your reply from before. The sequence looks like the same family to me.
Where do you feel the discrepencies are?

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,205577.0.html

Pauline
All census look up transcriptions are Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
======================================
We are not a search engine. We are human beings.

Offline nana1944

  • I am sorry but my emails are not working
  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: re George & Mary Ann Cleveley
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 14 January 07 18:06 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Pauline on second look I think I follow the ancestry now.
M.
Cleveley, Bowers, Fulton
Ollerton, Rusholme, Stockport,
Worcester