Author Topic: LDS "Family Search" problem  (Read 11167 times)

Online carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #54 on: Wednesday 31 January 07 18:22 GMT (UK) »
Oh dear I wonder why your family have been 'blacklisted' then  ;D ;D ;D

Amazing that you can get John and Mary Smith without too much trouble.

Very odd..................key the spooky music  8)

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline griz

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #55 on: Wednesday 31 January 07 20:27 GMT (UK) »
Hi Carol,
they must have been a very naughty family indeed! ;D

And he  was a postman! it sounds so respectable.

However I just remembered a Monty Python skit with a naughty postman. I think they also referred to  a naughty milkman and a naughty vicar . ;D


Boyle, Co. Leitrim  Boyle, Co. Tyrone, Shaughnessy, Co. Limerick, and  Manchester, UK.  Pope, Cheshire. Chadwick, Speke, Lancs.  Frankish, Hunmanby, Yorks.  Brindley, Audley, Staffs and  Middlesex.

Offline trish251

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *
  • Posts: 9,156
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #56 on: Thursday 01 February 07 00:44 GMT (UK) »
Hello Griz

Glad the information was useful - apologies it took me so long to agree that your family was giving grief in the search routine. I hadn't thought about him being a "naughty" postman - but I was intrigued at the various ways a postman was described - letter carrier to Civil servant to Postman - the evolving language we use  ;D

Trish
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline griz

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #57 on: Thursday 01 February 07 01:28 GMT (UK) »
 Yes,  its comical really.  ;D

  Another Brindley, Richard, (related to Theresa)  is a man  is described as  an 'Inspector of Waterworks', Hammersmith. on the 1901 census. I wonder if he was as important as he sounds?  :)
 

Thanks again for helping me, Trish, and  thanks to the other lovely people who posted re my puzzling predicament. 

(walks away muttering,  "I knew I was not crazy, I just knew it!.... mutter mutter..." ) ;D
Boyle, Co. Leitrim  Boyle, Co. Tyrone, Shaughnessy, Co. Limerick, and  Manchester, UK.  Pope, Cheshire. Chadwick, Speke, Lancs.  Frankish, Hunmanby, Yorks.  Brindley, Audley, Staffs and  Middlesex.


Offline trish251

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *
  • Posts: 9,156
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #58 on: Thursday 01 February 07 02:45 GMT (UK) »

 (walks away muttering,  "I knew I was not crazy, I just knew it!.... mutter mutter..." ) ;D


LOL  - but saying  "oh dear oh dear - I had my doubts!!"   ;D  ;D  - but I have apologised!!

Trish
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline griz

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #59 on: Thursday 01 February 07 05:07 GMT (UK) »
Hi Trish,  LOL Yes you did and there was no need   :)  anyway I wouldn't have believed me either. :)

My weird problem has turned out to be much  more interesting than just a blip at LDS. To have a partially- blacklisted family could be a sort of status symbol.  ;D

(A naughty family with the name 'Saint'!  :))

You have been very kind, thanks again.
Boyle, Co. Leitrim  Boyle, Co. Tyrone, Shaughnessy, Co. Limerick, and  Manchester, UK.  Pope, Cheshire. Chadwick, Speke, Lancs.  Frankish, Hunmanby, Yorks.  Brindley, Audley, Staffs and  Middlesex.

Online carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: LDS "Family Search" problem
« Reply #60 on: Thursday 01 February 07 07:44 GMT (UK) »

Quote
  (A naughty family with the name 'Saint'! :))   

I know  ;D that's exactly what I thought !
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk