HI Cheryl
I've pulled together the various posts from the Lanarkshire, Stirling and Dunbarton boards together with some PMs because at the very least, I'm getting confused
Firstly re post
www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,110629.0.html re Agnes Bryce Buchanan, not sure how these may be connected to your line although obviously the names (Bryce and Buchanan) are two that you are looking at.
Now going back to your original post for George:
Trying to find information ie birth for a George Buchanan, b about 1806, the son of a Robert Buchanan. Census 1851 in Glasgow gives his birth as Killearn, married to Margaret McFarlan b Drymen. Had at least 1 sister Elizabeth Buchanan (aged 55 years in the census) living with him.So this is the family in 1851:
George Buchana 45, carter, b. Kilean, Stirlingshire
Margaret Buchana 38, b. Drymen, Stirlingshire
Mary Buchana 16, d, b. Glasgow
Janet Buchana 14, d, b. Kilmaronock, Dumbartonshire
William Buchana 12, s, b. Kilmaronock, Dumbartonshire
Janet Paterson 22, lodger, french polisher, b. Clackmanan
Elizabeth Buchana 55, servant, sister in law, b. Kilean, Stirlingshire
And from Joe, the family in 1841:
1841 census; glebe street, barony martyrs
george...age 35...ag lab
margaret...age 30
mary...age 7
janet...age 5
william...age 3
All showing as born outside the county apart from Mary.
Tracing through the sister Elizabeth that shows living with George and Margaret, I sent you details of the 1861 census entry (and 1851) for another potential sister to George, Isabella, who married a David Bryce:
Isabella Bryn (Bryce) 58, b. Kilarn, Stirlingshire
Ann Bryn 20
Mary Bryn 18
Elizabeth Buchanan 69, b. Killearn, sister
Address: 63 George St, Paisley High Church, Renfrewshire
And the closest match for sister Elizabeth in the 1841 Census, maybe with mother Elizabeth McGibbon and a brother Robert (which would also fit as father was called Robert):
Elizabeth Buchanan abt 1771
Elizabeth Buchanan abt 1801
Robert Buchanan abt 1816, bridge keeper
Address: Stockingfield, Barony, Glasgow. All born out of county.
Now the children showing on IGI to a Robert Buchanan and Elizabeth McGibbon:
1. MARY BUCHANAN Christening: 16 SEP 1793 Killearn, Stirling, Scotland
2. DAVID BUCHANAN Christening: 15 JAN 1797 Killearn, Stirling, Scotland
3. ROBERT BUCHANAN Christening: 25 MAR 1810 Killearn, Stirling, Scotland
4. WILLIAM BUCHANAN Christening: 16 MAR 1806 Killearn, Stirling, Scotland
5. ELIZABETH BUCHANAN Christening: 07 JUL 1795 Killearn, Stirling, Scotland
From which you potentially have a William rather than a George and no Isabella showing, but as I'm sure you know the OPR entries are not always conclusive. You have however found documents in Australia which refer to George as ''W. George Buchanan' so the growing theory is that George may have been originally christened William which would fit the above OPR entry.
Also, by PM, I sent you the following:
Elizabeth's death in 1867 confirms parents as Robert, a watchman, and Elizabeth McGibbon. Mother's name Elizabeth would also fit better for the names given to George and Margaret's children (Mary Elizabeth b. 1834). Below are the 1841/51/61 entries for potential sister Isabella, with Elizabeth living with her in 1861...........So where do you go from here! It's a pity son William looks to have misreported father's mother's name incorrectly on George's DC. What we have all managed to pull together for you here on RootsChat is probably the most that can be extracted on line. The marriage for a George B. and Margaret McFarlane in 1832 as you know is a submitted entry. Just an outside possibility that he may have married as William, I have found this:
WILLIAM BUCHANAN Marriages: Spouse: MARGARET MCFARLANE
Marriage: 15 JUN 1827 Abbey (Paisley), Renfrew, Scotland
This is an actual extract from the OPRs. May explain, if there were some early children who died prior to the 1841 Census, why there are no children for the couple with their father's names (ie Robert and George)? The OPR images have just become available on line on SP. Remote chance that they may contain some additional info on the bride and groom but more likely the entry may not include any more info that shown above.
Regards.
Monica