Author Topic: Fishing bothy  (Read 6433 times)

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 13:38 BST (UK) »
Lovely job kid! Presumably Deskford, Cullen Skink comes from therraboots!

Skoosh.

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 14:40 BST (UK) »
" I don't like to be reminded of 2007 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

 That's the year my pet goldfish died. :( :( :( :(

 I had to buy a Budgie and that didn't live long either."


But you weren't supposed to keep the Budgie in the goldfish bowl, without emptying out the water first.  :-\ :-\ :-\

Malky

Offline tomkin

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,994
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 14:57 BST (UK) »

" But you weren't supposed to keep the Budgie in the goldfish bowl, without emptying out the water first.   

Malky"


          Now he tells me ::) ::) ::) Actually I thought it was quite good at the breast stroke. ;D ;D ;D


Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 14:59 BST (UK) »
If you compare it with today's Google Earth image, the photoghraph looks as if it was taken in Harbour Street, Port Erroll, Aberdeenshire, between number 20, and the offset cottage, between no's 20 and 21 looking South. In the skyline, you can see the golf course horizon, which is basically the same as it is today. The bridge in the photograph, has been replaced with the newer one. I would suggest that they were probably Salmon fishers. But that's only an opinion from an Aberdeenshire lad.

Malky


Offline tomkin

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,994
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #40 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 15:02 BST (UK) »

               Very good Malky :D

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #41 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 15:42 BST (UK) »
Further, the bridge, "in the background" crossing onto the golf course is the "Ladies Bridge", which crosses the Water of Cruden. It was built in 1922, paid for, by the ladies of the village, so they could get to the beach, hence the name.

So the photograph is more than likley dated post 1922.


Malky

Offline tomkin

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,994
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 16:53 BST (UK) »

                Malky!!  I already said "very Good"

                     So don't Milk it Malky ::) ::) ::)

                 But still very good  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #43 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 17:45 BST (UK) »
A salmon-fishers bothy might explain the coracle's? ;D

Skoosh.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Fishing bothy
« Reply #44 on: Wednesday 17 April 19 18:07 BST (UK) »
Could I direct you to the date Old Rowley gave in Reply #9 - ish. He dated it as 1902-1910.

He's a wiz at dating and I'd agree with him- clothing suggests that period.

West coast salmon is best  8)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***