Author Topic: 1851 census  (Read 11900 times)

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1851 census
« Reply #18 on: Monday 19 March 07 23:04 GMT (UK) »
1871 - RG10/5237; Folio: 68; Page: 25 - Cockermouth
Huntsman Inn, Main Street

Prop: Margaret Nixon

 
Stodart Lowry 40  Unmarried Ostler born Brigham ....
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1851 census
« Reply #19 on: Monday 19 March 07 23:08 GMT (UK) »
Thought I'd keep going till he married - but still not !

1881 - RG11/5172; Folio: 98; Page: 32 - Cockermouth
Derwent Street


Lodging with Margaret Johnston, Widow

 
Stoddart Lowrie 50 Lodger Unmarried General Labourer Papcastle


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline cass

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
    • View Profile
Re: 1851 census
« Reply #20 on: Monday 19 March 07 23:12 GMT (UK) »
What on earth is an ostler???? Shame he remained unmarried - would have like to have seen if he carried on the unusual christian name. Cass
Cumbria - Whitfield, Fagan, Murphy, Sloan, Weighman, Ousby, Brunskill
Hampshire - Alford
Ireland - County Down - Fagan, Murphy
Kidderminster - Whitfield

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1851 census
« Reply #21 on: Monday 19 March 07 23:16 GMT (UK) »
Hi Cass - an Ostler did things with horses, not sure the difference twixt Ostler & Groom, probably to do with leading vs grooming ?

Google will know !

Try seeing if theres a marriage post 1881 ?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1851 census
« Reply #22 on: Monday 19 March 07 23:18 GMT (UK) »
Doesnt seem to be much difference ...

Etymology
The word, recorded since c.1386, meaning "one who tends to horses at an inn," also, occasionally, "innkeeper", is sometimes jokingly said to be derived from "oat-stealer", but is actually derived from Anglo-French hostiler (modern French hostelier), itself from the Medieval Latin hostilarius "the monk who entertains guests at a monastery," from hospitale "inn" (compare hospital).

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk