Pages: [1]

Author Topic: in-laws!  (Read 638 times)

Offline mhrjh14

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
in-laws!
« on: Thursday 26 July 07 09:09 BST (UK) »
Hi all.
Would I be right in thinking that in 1861 a "son-in-law" aged 13 is most likely to be a step son? ???
Maggie
Ross:Midlothian, Croydon: Devon, Hancock: Somerset/Wales. Grigson: London, Covell: London, Grierson:Midlothian, Keir:Fife/Perth, Roe:London/Norfolk, Slocombe: Somerset/Wales, Vicarage:Somerset

Offline Tati

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,847
  • Ephraim's daughter to infinity & beyond
    • View Profile
Re: in-laws!
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 26 July 07 09:14 BST (UK) »
Yes  ;D
 "My dear, I think the English pronounce it 'appiness"  

I'm afraid of no ghost

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline mhrjh14

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: in-laws!
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 26 July 07 09:25 BST (UK) »
Thank you! :D
Ross:Midlothian, Croydon: Devon, Hancock: Somerset/Wales. Grigson: London, Covell: London, Grierson:Midlothian, Keir:Fife/Perth, Roe:London/Norfolk, Slocombe: Somerset/Wales, Vicarage:Somerset
Pages: [1]