Author Topic: Date this dress, please  (Read 1803 times)

Offline bell2

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 246
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date this dress, please
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 27 September 07 13:48 BST (UK) »


The dress below is from the Edwardian period,lots of lace,plus your dress has a train which was fashionable in the Edwardian times.it could fit both, Vic and Ed, just a thought  ???

http://www.fashion-era.com/images/Vintage_Clothes_Images/candylacedrs1416.2L.jpg
EADON:         Birmingham, Sheffield, India.
SHUBART:      Ireland, Devon, India,
LEE:              Guernsey, Devon. Leicestershire,
CASELEY:       Devon,Guernsey.
MONAGHAN:   Ireland,Devon,India, Lancashire,
CROXFORD:    Guernsey,
COPELAND:    Wales, India, Devon.
LUCIETT:        Ireland, Devon,Sussex.
MOREY:           London,  India.

Offline Dancing Master

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date this dress, please
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 27 September 07 19:42 BST (UK) »
The hairstyle looks 1940's,  in those times people wore second hand dresses from other era's, so could have been from the time of George V & Queen Mary's time. 

Offline chinakay

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,553
  • Our housegoof
    • View Profile
Re: Date this dress, please
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 27 September 07 21:39 BST (UK) »
Well, yes, the hairstyle is in fact from September 1947, when my mother was married in her great-grandmother's dress.

C
Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Moore/Addison~New Brunswick
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull

Offline chinakay

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,553
  • Our housegoof
    • View Profile
Re: Date this dress, please
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 27 September 07 21:57 BST (UK) »
Thanks Belle and Elizabeth...I'm thinking more Edwardian, now, because the woman it supposedly belonged to lived from 1858 to about 1918 or so. The dress, which was very fine silk under the lace, was in very good condition when I saw it and I think if it was from the 1860s it would not have been wearable in 1947. I'm thinking the "great-grandmother" bit on the back of the photo, which wasn't written in my mother's handwriting, is a mistake.

Need OR to check in!

Cheers,
C
Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Moore/Addison~New Brunswick
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull