David -
That's fantastic - thanks so much!
Re: Charlotte, daughter of John Swann and Elizabeth, she is in Huntingdon, St Benedicts in 1841, with the rest of the family, aged 13. I didn't think she would be so significant, so didn't list her by name!
So she is definitely the daughter of John and Elizabeth. As is Henry T, according to the baptism you've found.
And John in his turn is son of Thomas, as suspected.
Which brings us to the question of Henry's middle name.
To digress slightly, my g-grandfather was Charles Monteith Abbott. The Monteith, it seemed, came from his grandmother, Esther Monteith. Thinking it was therefore a relatively important family name (it is still used in our family) I assumed we were Monteith descendants and scoured Cambs and Essex for them for several months! However, certificates then showed that Esther Monteith was a widow when she married into the Abbott family, and her family name was in fact Emmens. So why did the family take the name of her husband of just a few years? The answer was very simple in the end. Esther and her Monteith husband had a daughter, Hannah Maria, who was godmother to her half-nephew Charles Monteith Abbott.
Might the Tomlinson have come from the same source? i.e. was Henry's auntie Elizabeth his godmother?
Alternatively, perhaps Edward died and John married his widow? Which could explain why Edward and Elizabeth had only the one son that you could find in the BVRI. If Edward married Elizabeth in 1807, and they had the one child in 1810, there is time before John and Elizabeth start baptising children in 1812 for such an event to occur.
I can't find a death or burial for Edward, but nor can I find him or Elizabeth in any census return. The IGI doesn't show any marriage, but the batches covering Huntingdon are far from complete, and there is a gap in the St Mary & St Benedict marriage records from 1783 to 1813, and no marriages at all for the other parishes.
I found a Henry Swann, son of John Swann, apprenticed to George Custance on 30 May 1835 via the Fishborne charity. George Custance was a tailor in Gt Stukeley, so it seems like a match. John is listed in 1851 as a yeoman and in 1861 as a retired veterinarian. Seems odd that he would need a charity handout to get his son apprenticed?
Intriguingly, George Custance, a tailor aged 30 is in Huntingdon County Gaol in 1841 - whilst his family are in Huntingdon. He has a P against his name, so is clearly a prisoner. I wonder what for?
Thanks for all the info, David! At least my distant relative now has specific things to look for - especially a putative death for Edward and a possible marriage for John to his widow. And as they came from Rutland, perhaps we aren't cousins after all.....
-------------------------------
LATER - I have just noticed your postscript - I found exactly the same thing!s "Stitched up" - ho, ho, ho!