Rambler & DS -
These finding are a bit strange to say the least
)
This is what I had before for Pass HADDOCK so I hadn't seen the Pass GOULDEN/GOULDING birth/death --
England & Wales, FreeBMD Index: 1837-1983
Name: Haddock, Pass
Record Type: Births
Quarter: June
Year: 1891
District: Northwich
County: Cheshire
Volume: 8a
Page: 269
* *
England & Wales, FreeBMD Index: 1837-1983
Name: HADDOCK, Pass
Record Type: Deaths
Age at death: 0
Quarter: June
Year: 1891
District: Northwich
County: Cheshire
Volume: 8a
Page: 228
* *
I have no idea why Alfred is listed as UNmarried in 1881 Census as he married Martha DICKINSON on Oct 04 1880 at St George's, Tyldesley.
I do know that Alfred HADDOCK that married Martha in 1880 and Hannah/Ann in 1886 were one and the same people! I have his death cert and someone the other day sent me his burial info as well as Ann's and 2 of their sons'. Confirmation that Alfred was born 1860 and in Barnton and the s/o Thomas HADDOCK & Ann WORRALL of Barnton.
The only way I knew Ann's name was from the following newspaper snippet --
CHESTER AND NORTH WALES ASSIZES
Liverpool Mercury etc (Liverpool, England), Monday, October 31, 1887; Issue 12420.
Alfred HADDOCK, 24, boatman, sentenced to 1 month imprisonment for marrying Hannah BOND in Moulton on Sep 06 1887 when his 1st wife Martha HADDOCK was still alive!!
In doing a check of the marriages at the Free BMD, I realized that I had never searched for HAYDOCK and that was how he was listed there.
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church Registers At Reference
HAYDOCK Alfred BOND Hannah Runcorn, All Saints Halton C12/7/136
* *
England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index: 1837-1983
Name: Alfred Haydock
Year of Registration: 1886
Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep
District: Runcorn
County: Cheshire
Volume: 8a
Page: 351
Hannah Bond 1886 Jul-Aug-Sep Runcorn Cheshire
Alfred Haydock 1886 Jul-Aug-Sep Runcorn Cheshire
* *
This Pass GOULDEN/GOULDING is very interesting though with an Ann who matches because I have been UNABLE to find any Ann or Hannah BOND with a matching birthplace and year in the 1871 or 1881 Census.
Perhaps this explains why??
The other thing that is very strange is that although a daugther named Mary E HADDOCK born abt 1887 is with them in 1891 Census, I can find NOTHING at all for her with regard to Birth, Marriage or Death and wonder whether she was a figment of the Census taker's imagination??
(
It is odd that NONE of their infant children are buried with them but adult sons are??
I appreciate all the help and discoveries and ideas that you've shared and would be thrilled if you come up with anything else!
Dallas