Hi alchemyst
No Dills in Genealogy - I still can't see for looking sometimes, myself!
But her entry may have been a recent update onto the FREEBMD? That was the database I used. And while other sites do
host the FREEBMD data, I prefer overall to use it at it's own "home" site.... because It has good freedom of search with Wildcarding acceptable in any position.
http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.plFirst step : was establishing :--
Where they married
where they had children and when and where was the last born
Where they were in 1901
All answers Sculcoates and last known Jun Qtr 1903 with birth of son there. Husband remarried Jun Qtr 1911 Beverley.
So first try is based on assumption she died in Sculcoates Reg District. between Jun Qtr 1903 and Jun Qtr 1911.
Realising the name NENDICK can be found as NEWDICK, NEUDICK, MENDICK etc - I just concentrated on the last part of the name.....
Searched:First Name: Annie E (just E will pick up a middle initial E or fully written middle names beginning with E - no need to wildcard the E as E*)
Last name: *DICKFrom Jun Qtr 1903 to Jun Qtr 1911
District: SculcoatesWalla!
But If that had not found her, I would have first widened the district to all of the East Ridings..etc then tried shortning her first name to just Ann or Ann* and so on....
Knowing how it's indexed now, if you try to search for it as "NE_DICK" though, it will fail. The search engine doesn't like the underscore. You'd have to search as NE*DICK
SOmetimes, FREEBMD baulks at a search like this if it takes too much time to run,and is performed at a busy time of the web-day. Especially it there are a lot of wildcards * too. The search isn't invalid if it times-out , you just need to try again later when it's not so busy.
Hope this helps! Good luck with further unravellings
Cheers
AMBLY