Hi All
Had a look at the website and I would make the following observations .
I think it is good that a disclaimer has been included and
I repeat what it says here for the benefit of the thread.
Disclaimer
The coats of arms on this website are to the best of my knowledge, accurately portrayed and referable to accepted source material. However, it is possible that there are a few that are incorrect for one reason or another, through no conscious fault of mine. The most likely cause of this is an error in the source reference. There is no totally reliable source for coats of arms and plenty of unreliable ones.
I am always happy to try to correct any such errors as they are pointed out to me, but I will not enter into time consuming and pointless discussion with critics whose motivation is "oneupmanship" or some desire to prove that they are smarter than I am (everyone is smarter than I am). Sending me snotty emails is not likely to get any response.
His words not mine.. I agree about the lack of a reliable source.
But I still take issue with the fact that from a lack of an explaination re "Rights" to Arms it is easy to assume that the Surname Coats of Arms exist. The start of this thread....
Now for Kazza.( I have put on my pedantic cap.)
Your Blazon description is lacking a positional reference for the annulet which in turn gives the position of the lozenges . ie between.
Not sure what is meant by of the first.
If I was you I would be aiming for ......
Blue backgroung (Azure)..
I think you should try and colour your lozenges Gold or failing that Yellow. (Or) as the ones portrayed are Argent
(Silver or White.) The Annulet stays white or silver.
With the change to Gold you can be sure that it was used by William Robert HOLE... and use the reference from Armorial Families to back it up.
Best wishes
Grandad james.