« Reply #6 on: Thursday 26 February 09 20:51 GMT (UK) »
Hi Caron
If the reputed father was named, and if he couldnt marry the mother, then often he may be forced to pay maintenance from the local Poor Law. After 1834 as in your case, she may have applied for an affliation order or maintenance order. The parish would have wanted the father to pay towards the baby's upkeep if the father was known. Often the mother was forced to reveal the fathers name and in many cases he married the mother, either out of his own steam or forced. He may have married the mum when he was free to, which may have had to have been after the birth. As said, if he couldnt marry the mum due to being already married, then he would probably have had to pay maintenance through the parish, courts or even a private agreement within the family which there is little or no chance of any mention of such an agreement if it was private.
If the father was unknown or had died or ran off, then the baby may have been given up and boarded out of handed over to a relative of the mother, or even blended in by saying the baby was a neice, cousin or a much younger sibling but if Caroline's gran was about 55 in 1858, she may not have got away with pretending that she was the mother. Caroline was handed over to her grandparents while her mum went for work.
My best bet would be to try Quarter Sessions, then maybe see if Coddenham churchwarden accounts survive. As Susan never married after the birth, then you may strike it lucky through the records that I mentioned.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain