Author Topic: 1911 transcriptions  (Read 4062 times)

Offline tinav40

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
1911 transcriptions
« on: Wednesday 04 March 09 18:43 GMT (UK) »
I have reported a lot of transcription errors to the web site and today had some replies.
They have said that they believe they are correct. ;D
So if you are looking for an ancestor in Sedgeberrow try typing in Surlgeberrow and if your great uncle was Jack try Vach as an alternative. Oh almost forgot Cropthorne is Crowthorpe, but hey, I must be wrong. ;D ;D ;D

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 18:49 GMT (UK) »
They say Our policy is to only accept changes if they match the entry on the original page, and we are unable to make changes based on information supplied to us from a different source.
So you have to view the original page for 30 credits to submit any errors.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline tinav40

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 18:53 GMT (UK) »
Hi Stan

I do have all the originals and as I still live in the area I am 100% sure that I am correct I don't mind myself because I realise what the place names are. If you don't live where your ancestors came from I can imagine a whole lot of made up place names on family trees. ???

Offline Gaille

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 18:54 GMT (UK) »
They say Our policy is to only accept changes if they match the entry on the original page, and we are unable to make changes based on information supplied to us from a different source.
So you have to view the original page for 30 credits to submit any errors.

Stan


They said that to me too ...............so I emailed them the scan of gt-grandmas birth certificate  - figured they couldnt say an ORIGINAL 1875 birth cert was a different source! (it has the original date on it!) ;)
Got an email back saying they would amend the error, that was several weeks ago tho & they havent done it yet.

Gaille
Manchester – Bate(s) / Bebbington / Coppock or Coppart / Evans / Mitchell / Prince / Smith

Cheshire Latchford – Bibby / Savage / Smith.
Cheshire Macclesfield,  Bollington & Rainow – Childs / Flint / Mc'rea
Cheshire Crewe – Bate(s) / Bebbington
Shropshire Wellington, Wobwell – Smith
Walsall Midds – Smith
Norfolk - Childs / Hanwell / Smith

Also looking for:
Mc'Rea/McCrea – Ireland to Cheshire

And
any relatives of Margaret Bibby married to Thomas Smith all over country


Offline BettyofKent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,998
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 19:02 GMT (UK) »
I've just received one of these emails.
I sent in several corrections, but I don't know to which one this refers, as it only gives a reference number.
I only sent ones where I had seen the original & the transcription was clearly wrong, so I don't know why it hasn't been accepted.

Betty
KENT:
Stutely - Wittersham & Stone
Padgham - Wittersham
Wanstall - Northbourne
Taylor - Ringwould & Ash
Skinner - Deal
Bushell - Walmer
Spain - Walmer
Also
Schloss - Poland, Nottingham, Massachusetts & New Zealand.
Cohen - Birmingham

"Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov."

Offline Mum44

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,141
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 19:20 GMT (UK) »


Same here, Betty.  I even spent some credits to check the originals before I submitted the errors found on the transcripts :(
Census information is Crown Copyright from TNA.
Titchfield, Hampshire: Reed,  Fielder, Cawte, Goddard.
Kent:  Float,  Cutbush. 
Wallasey, Cheshire: Carroll, Ledsham.
Liverpool : Horsfall, Prescott

Offline Keziahemm

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,760
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 19:28 GMT (UK) »
Same here   >:(

One of the transcriptions I sent a correction for, had the stepson's name as the stepdaughter
and the stepdaughter was missed off entirely yet was on the original.  How can that be correct?

Susan
Herefordshire: Mytton.
Lincs: Ingham
Northants: Knight (Welford); Linnell;  Gaudern.
Staffs (Brierley Hill, Kingswinford): Wood; Eades.
Somerset: Bailey; Lewis
Warwickshire: (Alcester, Henley in Arden) Lewis; Casey/Keasey
Warwickshire (Birmingham suburbs) Knight
Yorkshire (Bradford):  Ingham


Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 19:36 GMT (UK) »
Had transcription problems myself, i.e. Sydney Harold Luffman shown as Sydney Harrold Suffoma, how do they get that one? Also a batch of Luffman entries shown as Suffman, a name that does not exist. They can't tell a capital copperplate L from an S. Luckily Rootschat gave a solution, i.e. Christian name, place and year of birth, punctuation marks for the surname. This works, but sometimes takes a few attempts.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 transcriptions
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 04 March 09 19:53 GMT (UK) »

They said that to me too ...............so I emailed them the scan of gt-grandmas birth certificate  - figured they couldnt say an ORIGINAL 1875 birth cert was a different source! (it has the original date on it!) ;)
Got an email back saying they would amend the error, that was several weeks ago tho & they havent done it yet.

Gaille

However the birth certificate is no proof that the census transcribers got it wrong.
Transcribers should only write what they see not what they think or know it should be.
Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.