1891, 1901 census lookup, please.

[Janae]

Harry Lincoln Denley  was age 10 living at home at
2 S Stephens Terr, Claines, Worcester in 1881.

Please would someone be kind enough to find him in 1891 and 1901.  I am particularly interested in his occupation.

Thank you,
Janae    Australia

[karenlee]

Hi Janae

This could be him

1901 Census England Worcestershire Worcester
RG13/2782/42/42
Cypress Street

DENLEY
Daniel Head Marr 53 Stone Mason Worcestershire Broadway
Lydia Wife Marr 52 Worcestershire Worcester
Amy Dau Unmarr 30 Worcestershire Worcester
Harry Son Unmarr 30 Clothier Worcestershire Worcester
Luther Son Unmarr 28 Tailor Warwickshire Coleshill
Lilian Dau Unmarr 21 Clothier's Assistant Worcestershire Worcester
Minnie Dau Unmarr 20 Dress Maker Worcestershire Worcester
Hubert Son Unmarr 10 Worcestershire Worcester

Cheers
Karenlee

[Janae]

Thank you, that seems to be the one  as Daniel and Lydia are the names of the parents given in 1881.

I appreiate you help.

Janae.

[Isobelruss]

1891
The family are at Cypress Street but Harry is not with them

RG12 2330/94/23

[karenlee]

Hi

The closest that I can find is this one, transcribed as Harry DENTY, but not sure if it's your Harry or not....

1891 Census England London Paddington St Mary Paddington
RG12/7/18/30
346 Harrow Road

ALLWORTHY
Joseph Head Unmarr 53 Pawnbroker London St George Martyr
Elizabeth Sister Unmarr 50 London St George Martyr
Deborah Sister Unmarr 47 London St George Martyr
George Nephew Unmarr 20 Pawnbroker's Assistant Croyden Surrey
Harry DENLEY Assistant Unmarr 20 Pawnbroker's Assistant Worcester
Ernest A MASSEY Assistant Unmarr 18 Pawnbroker's Assistant Middlesex Harrow Weald
Arthur WILKINS Assistant Unmarr 15 Pawnbroker's Assistant London Bermondsey

Cheers
Karenlee

[Janae]

Thank you,  I'm not sure if he is the one either.  He is the correct age.

I will keep him as a possibility although I did not expect him to be in London.

Cheers,
Janae.

[karenlee]

No Janae

The occupation isn't right either, compared to the other Census, but that could just have been the work he could find at the time.  Also the London connection doesn't fit either... but that's the closest I could find.  Might be totally wrong with this one.

Cheers
Karenlee

[Janae]

Time will tell.  Things are often not straightforward.

He married in1904.  I will need to try to subscribe to the 1911 Census.

Thanks for helping.
Cheers,
Janae  Australia